017 10:53:03
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search on device with --x-split-name-index
option
Hi Gerd
> BTW: Why do we fill mdr17 when index is created for the PC?
> It seems not to be written but requires memory.
That's true, it is not used
Hi Gerd
BTW: Why do we fill mdr17 when index is created for the PC?
It seems not to be written but requires memory.
That's true, it is not used and does not need to be calculated for the
desktop index.
..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
oun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Steve
Ratcliffe <st...@parabola.me.uk>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. April 2017 10:03:53
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search on device with --x-split-name-index
option
On 11/04/17 07:54, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Gerd
I just noticed that the gmapsupp produced by MapSource changes a lot when I
enable/disable option --x-split-name-index, so it probably calculates the
gmapsupp index
based on the index calculated by mkgmap, not from scratch. If that is true it
is probably not a good idea to use that
On 11/04/17 07:54, Gerd Petermann wrote:
One point that might be interesting: I compare the listing produced by
MdrDisplay for the gmapsupp produced by r3449 and the one from MapSource.
I see a much longer list in Mdr17 for r3449.
Oh yes you are right, from a quick look it appears that mkgmap
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd
Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. April 2017 07:56:16
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search on d
;mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd
Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. April 2017 07:56:16
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search on device with --x-split-name-index
option
Hi Steve,
good qu
Hi Gerd,
same problem with r3449 and r3472.
Oh that is a shame. Does it work if mapsource creates the gmapsupp?
The mdr20 looks similar in either case, although the repeat flags are
incorrect in the mkgmap generated one.
..Steve
___
mkgmap-dev
ag, 9. April 2017 11:52:09
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search on device with --x-split-name-index
option
Hi
> When I change the code in mdr20 to ignore the additional entries
> produced with the "--x-split-name-index" option the problem seems
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Address search on device with --x-split-name-index
option
Hi
> When I change the code in mdr20 to ignore the additional entries
> produced with the "--x-split-name-index" option the problem seems to
> be solved, I just don't find "Obere Rheinga
Hi
When I change the code in mdr20 to ignore the additional entries
produced with the "--x-split-name-index" option the problem seems to
be solved, I just don't find "Obere Rheingasse" when I search for
"Rheingasse".
The on device version of mdr20 certainly supports this, so it should
work
Aan: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Onderwerp: [mkgmap-dev] Address search on device with --x-split-name-index
option
Hi all,
not sure how this works on other devices. I have a map containing a part of the
alps with parts of Germany, Switzerland and France.
On my Oregon 600 when I search for an ad
Hi all,
not sure how this works on other devices. I have a map containing a part of the
alps with parts of Germany, Switzerland and France.
On my Oregon 600 when I search for an address I have some dialogs
1) select a country (I select Switzerland)
2) select city or select "search all"
3) Enter
13 matches
Mail list logo