Charlie,
> So why have a placeholder when you could just put in a polygon definition?
Good question - the placeholder simply gives the polygon's draw
priority, the style for that polygon will be whatever default the
GPS/mapsource uses. When you provide a full definition, you specify the
visual s
Mark Burton wrote:
> Hi Charlie,
>
>> I see you've got lots of placeholder polygons in your TYP file. Do you
>> know what these are / what they do / why one might want to use them?
>
> If you use a TYP file, then you require either a polygon definition or
> a placeholder for every type of pol
Hi Charlie,
> I see you've got lots of placeholder polygons in your TYP file. Do you
> know what these are / what they do / why one might want to use them?
If you use a TYP file, then you require either a polygon definition or
a placeholder for every type of polygon that you want in the map.
T
Mark Burton wrote:
> Hi Bennie,
>
> Thanks for the kind words.
>
> I attach the TYP file I am currently using. It's very simple, I think
> most people use more complicated files than that.
>
> I also attach the style files. They are fairly similar to the default
> files with a few tweaked valu
Hi Bennie,
Thanks for the kind words.
I attach the TYP file I am currently using. It's very simple, I think
most people use more complicated files than that.
I also attach the style files. They are fairly similar to the default
files with a few tweaked values here and there. The seamark
related
MB>I'm really pleased how well the Baltic marine map has come along
It does look good.
WELL DONE.
Would you share your TYP file & style with us.
Or is it proprietary.
No objection if it is.
You did all the work.
All the same I like the look and want to try it on my map.
Further: I have not tried t