-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
Aan: Development list for mkgmap
Hi, > If my interpretation is correct, it says that all those types of >
highway are considered as unpaved, unless there is a surface, > tracktype,
smoothness AND sac_scale parameter! Rule is OK. If you negate conjunction
Hi,
> If my interpretation is correct, it says that all those types of
> highway are considered as unpaved, unless there is a surface,
> tracktype, smoothness AND sac_scale parameter!
Rule is OK. If you negate conjunction (by use of "unless"), then you
should use disjunction of negations:
Van: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> namens lig fietser
<ligfiet...@hotmail.com>
Verzonden: maandag 6 februari 2017 01:40:46
Aan: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
Thanks Gerd!
_
Thanks Gerd!
Hi,
if I got that right the forum agreed to this, so if nobody complains I'll
change the default
style as suggested on thursday.
Gerd
ligfietser wrote
> The problem is that it works too well. Paved roads with some potholes
> which are marked as
ble)'
> { add mkgmap:road-speed = '-2' }
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Van: mkgmap-dev
> mkgmap-dev-bounces@.org
> namens Gerd Petermann
> GPetermann_muenchen@
>
> Verzonden: maandag 30 januari 2017 03:10:15
> Aan: Development list for mk
g 30 januari 2017 03:10:15
Aan: Development list for mkgmap
Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
I did not try if the rule itself works. If it catches "bad", "very_bad", and
all worser values I think it is good as it is.
Gerd
_
fiet...@hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Montag, 30. Januar 2017 10:07:07
An: mkgmap-dev
Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] Is smoothness=bad unpaved?
Hi list,
On the Garmin OSM forum there is a discussion started whether we should
consider smoothness=bad as unpaved. In the default rules it is treated as
unpaved. Wha
Hi list,
On the Garmin OSM forum there is a discussion started whether we should
consider smoothness=bad as unpaved. In the default rules it is treated as
unpaved. What do you think?
Should we adapt the rules and skip 'bad' from the unpaved list?
