On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 23:18:24 +0100, Henning Scholland wrote:
It seems to be an error in osm-data. If you have a MP, all taggs on
outer way describes the hole polygon. All taggs on MP-relation describes
the area between outer and inner polygon.
I don't interpret the Wiki docs in this way.
Chris66 schrieb am 22.02.2011 11:05:
Indeed the most MPs are tagged like this:
relation: type=multipolygon
outerway: landuse=forest (example)
innerway: no-tags (or tags for inner area).
The forest is of course only the area between inner and outer.
This is one of the accepted taggings
Am 22.02.2011 16:55, schrieb Torsten Leistikow:
relation: type=multipolygon
outerway: landuse=forest (example)
innerway: no-tags (or tags for inner area).
The forest is of course only the area between inner and outer.
This is one of the accepted taggings for a multipolygon.
The other
Hi,
I found now several buildings/areas, which where constructed
with multipolygons, but where only the inner polygons where
ignored for rendering.
As an example see at:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/56430
This is a building with tree inner polygons. As long as
the
Hi,
I found now several buildings/areas, which where constructed
with multipolygons, but where only the inner polygons where
ignored for rendering.
As an example see at:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/56430
This is a building with tree inner polygons. As long as
the
On Mon, Feb 21, Henning Scholland wrote:
Am 21.02.2011 23:13, schrieb Thorsten Kukuk:
Hi,
I found now several buildings/areas, which where constructed
with multipolygons, but where only the inner polygons where
ignored for rendering
Hi Thorsten
It seems to be an error in osm-data.
Am 22.02.2011 00:03, schrieb Thorsten Kukuk:
On Mon, Feb 21, Henning Scholland wrote:
Am 21.02.2011 23:13, schrieb Thorsten Kukuk:
Hi,
I found now several buildings/areas, which where constructed
with multipolygons, but where only the inner polygons where
ignored for rendering
Hi Thorsten
On Tue, Feb 22, Henning Scholland wrote:
You can take a look into our wiki (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Relation:multipolygon )
I know that, thanks! But from 15 Multipolygons I checked now
in Nuernberg, only one was correct ...
And I only checked a very, very small piece ...