Re: [mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

2018-05-16 Thread UliBaer
Hi, i have comparable performance to former Java 8 and considerable lower memory consumption, when i use the OpenJDK 10 with the Eclipse OpenJ9 VM from AdoptOpenJDK! It is not officially released jet, but i use it with great success. If you want to try, you'll have to use the nightly builds from

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

2018-05-16 Thread Gerd Petermann
to 10 or higher. Gerd Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann <extremecar...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2018 16:05:50 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Perfo

Re: [mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

2018-05-16 Thread Felix Hartmann
Hi Gerd, What about if you compile mkgmap with java 9 or higher - and run it on Java 8 - this also applies or not? Or asked differently - is this dependant on the compilation system or on the executing system? Felix On 16 May 2018 at 15:53, Gerd Petermann

[mkgmap-dev] Performance hints for Java JRE 9 + 10

2018-05-16 Thread Gerd Petermann
Hi all, it seems that the new Garbage Collector (G1GC) that was introduced with Java JRE 9 causes longer run times for splitter and mkgmap. I've played with some options and found that the use of -XX:+AggressiveHeap seems to be a good idea when you use these newer JREs. Without this option the