Felix Hartmann
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2021 13:19
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution
> 23 raster problems
>
> Wow - looks really good. The main problem I feel is now that sometimes
> highways yo
Felix
Hartmann
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2021 13:19
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Wow - looks really good. The main problem I feel is now that sometimes highways
you can see both directions apart - while
_
> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von
> Felix Hartmann
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2021 11:03
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution
> 23 raster problems
>
> well I never go
: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2021 11:03
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
well I never got the merge-more patch actually running as together with
simplify v4 it did not change anything for me. I'm waiting for updates
well I never got the merge-more patch actually running as together with
simplify v4 it did not change anything for me. I'm waiting for updates on
the new branch to test things.
I still feel level>=1, the higher the level the less exact it needs to be.
It just needs to be small and beautiful from
a NET file.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Felix
Hartmann
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2021 07:59
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
I think actually for any
ev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>>
im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann
mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com><mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>>>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Mai 2021 19:15
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-de
Gesendet: Montag, 3. Mai 2021 07:27
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Actually I think I did some mistake concerning the patch - or the patch is not
working together with the simplify v4 patch. I think I made
far I never found a hint for that.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Gerd
Petermann
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Mai 2021 19:15
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Hi
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Felix
Hartmann
Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Mai 2021 17:50
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
yes I tried it out now without additional DP changes. Routing was identical in
18
trunk.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von
> Felix Hartmann
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 2. Mai 2021 15:09
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution
> 23 raster problems
>
> Going to test out the patch
list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Going to test out the patch a bit more right now. Only problem for me is - I
cannot set custom dp filter anymore.. But I guess you will implement that
anyhow soon?
compile:
[javac
Felix Hartmann
> Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Mai 2021 18:06
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution
> 23 raster problems
>
> well I increased it to 0.5, and could not see any place which was actually
> different. I no
ted.
Gerd
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Felix
Hartmann
Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Mai 2021 18:06
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
well I increased it to 0.5, and co
> compilation time unless we find clever tricks to avoid that.
>
> Gerd
>
>
> Von: mkgmap-dev mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>> im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann <
> extremecar...@gmail.com<mailto:extremecar...@gmail.com>
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Are you sure it would be needing that much more memory? If there is a big
penalty this simplification could only be done for lower resolutions, which
contain much less data
_
> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von
> Felix Hartmann
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 29. April 2021 14:39
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution
> 23 raster problems
>
> here is what I mean - zig zagging lik
2021 16:42
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Are you sure it would be needing that much more memory? If there is a big
penalty this simplification could only be done for lower resolutions, which
contain
he past. It's
> difficult to test because the changes heavily depend on the Styte AND the
> mapped objects AND the mappers preferences. For example, if landuse areas
> are glued to highways or not, if landuse areas are glued to other landuse
> areas or if there nodes are just very close
-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
here is what I mean - zig zagging like crazy if you look at it with lowest
detail which is really helpful to see this problem. Those highways should be
just straight. Oh yes - because the highways are two separate lanes
point if that would give the best result.
>>
>> Gerd
>>
>> ____
>> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von
>> Gerd Petermann
>> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. April 2021 15:21
>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>> Betreff:
__
> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von
> Gerd Petermann
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. April 2021 15:21
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution
> 23 raster problems
>
> Hi Felix,
>
&
2021 15:21
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Hi Felix,
I expect (more) small missing parts of complex shapes like forests or waterway
areas (those without mkgmap:skipSizeFilter=true) and more obvious
>>
im Auftrag von Felix Hartmann
mailto:extremecar...@gmail.com>>
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. April 2021 04:54
An: Development list for mkgmap; Andrzej Popowski
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
forgot 1.3 value - that is good enough
04:54
> An: Development list for mkgmap; Andrzej Popowski
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution
> 23 raster problems
>
> forgot 1.3 value - that is good enough (and this location is not the most
> difficult, but there are very few places that are
An: Development list for mkgmap; Andrzej Popowski
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
forgot 1.3 value - that is good enough (and this location is not the most
difficult, but there are very few places that are worse. So I feel it's good
-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Hi,
some more experiments, see attached patch. I have tried to optimize
rounding of coordinates for lowest distance to line. This is not good
for polygons, because can creates gaps between adjacent polygons.
--
Best regards
Hi,
some more experiments, see attached patch. I have tried to optimize
rounding of coordinates for lowest distance to line. This is not good
for polygons, because can creates gaps between adjacent polygons.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej
Index: src/uk/me/parabola/mkgmap/build/MapBuilder.java
a separate program or a special
>>> method in mkgmap which just treats contour lines
>>> - take generated contour data as input
>>> - rerender each way with resolution 23 nodes so that the line looks
>>> almost like before. This means it may add nodes somewhe
gt; like before. This means it may add nodes somewhere and remove others.
> - maybe re-iterate if the rerendering caused overlapping contour lines
> where original lines where not overlapping
>
> Gerd
>
>
>
> ________
> Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag
__
Von: mkgmap-dev im Auftrag von Felix
Hartmann
Gesendet: Montag, 26. April 2021 08:55
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Thanks Andrzej for the patch.
It produces better results in
Thanks Andrzej for the patch.
It produces better results in about 2/3 of cases, and worse in about 1/3 of
cases for resolution 23. So overall it's an improvement, and at least for
compiling contourlines I didn't notice a significant difference in compile
time. I could test this more in detail also
Hi Gerd,
I don't observe any significant differences in compilation. But to make
it more optimized, we can put SizeFilter before DouglasPeuckerFilter. I
have attached a second patch here.
There is a difference in results. See pictures with DouglasPeuckerFilter
after RoundCoordsFilter and
Popowski
Gesendet: Sonntag, 25. April 2021 17:47
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] mkgmap-dev Digest, Vol 153, Issue 40 Resolution 23
raster problems
Hi,
maybe 10m contours are too dense for this area?
Please try attached patch. I have moved D-P simplification before
Hi,
maybe 10m contours are too dense for this area?
Please try attached patch. I have moved D-P simplification before
rounding of coordination. This should preserve shape of the line a bit
better. I'm not sure if this is a safe modification, but it seems to works.
I haven't found, where is
35 matches
Mail list logo
