Change line 170 of src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/trergn/TREHeader.java
to output 0x170401 instead of 0x110301.
I'm happy to try this but won't be able to report back for a few days
So I finally got chance to try this out and after a brief test I would
say that at best it's the same as
Felix Hartmann escribió:
Strange that it's working for you. I'm allways on SVN latest wit
hVista HCx, I even think that before the updates it worked better.
Some time ago (but after time recalculation was improved) I had the
same problem. Finally I solved it building mkgmap from a fresh svn.
Felix Hartmann schrieb:
Strange that it's working for you. I'm allways on SVN latest wit
hVista HCx, I even think that before the updates it worked better.
Could it be that you use a modified style file?
Some changed settings in the bit resolution for the layers? As far as I
know, these
With my vista hcx and using the current value of 0x110301, the route
recalculates if I go off course by no more than about 25m. I believe
other people are also getting similar results. Perhaps people could
confirm that?
Yes, I can confirm that.
On my etrex Legend before the patch I had a
Hi Felix,
I found out the problem associated to route recalculation not working
(well working but only far too late). We currently set the TRE header at
1,3,17 IF we change this over to 1,4,23 route recalculation kicks in at
around 25-30m instead of 300-400 (as it happens with 1,3,17 we
Let's hear them. I got many many complaints that my maps don't
recalculate...
How can I change 0x110301 so that it sets 1,4,23 instead of 1,3,17?
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Felix,
I found out the problem associated to route recalculation not working
(well working but only far too late). We
Hi Felix,
Let's hear them. I got many many complaints that my maps don't
recalculate...
Speak up chaps, how's the recalculating working out?
How can I change 0x110301 so that it sets 1,4,23 instead of 1,3,17?
Change line 170 of src/uk/me/parabola/imgfmt/app/trergn/TREHeader.java
to output
Mark Burton wrote:
Hi Felix,
Let's hear them. I got many many complaints that my maps don't
recalculate...
Speak up chaps, how's the recalculating working out?
With the current mkgmap I get recalculation between 25 and 50m. Prior to
the discussion [mkgmap-dev] [PATCH] route
Oggetto: Re: [mkgmap-dev] route recalculation senstivity bug found
A: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Data: Sabato 13 giugno 2009, 20:26
Hi Felix,
I found out the problem associated to route
recalculation not working
(well working but only far too late). We currently set
the TRE header
Mark Burton wrote:
With my vista hcx and using the current value of 0x110301, the route
recalculates if I go off course by no more than about 25m. I believe
other people are also getting similar results. Perhaps people could
confirm that?
My eTrex Legend HCx with a map generated by mkgmap
Hi Felix,
BTW - thanks to those who have responded re performance of the current
value.
Strange that it's working for you. I'm allways on SVN latest wit hVista
HCx, I even think that before the updates it worked better. Anyhow I now
use the different value and am happy. Could it be that
O.k. so there must be another reason.
Maybe its as well related to road_speed or road_class?
(Garmin may think that the lower the road_speed the higher the chance
that there are buildings that obstruct GPS reception, or the lower the
accuracy of the maps, cause minor roads are not that well
Felix,
O.k. so there must be another reason.
Maybe its as well related to road_speed or road_class?
(Garmin may think that the lower the road_speed the higher the chance
that there are buildings that obstruct GPS reception, or the lower the
accuracy of the maps, cause minor roads are
Yeah getting that 3byte field to work would be splendid. There are so
many lines that one can't differentiate without it. Especially as
Maspource only displays half as many compared to the gps.
Mark Burton wrote:
Felix,
O.k. so there must be another reason.
Maybe its as well related to
Hi Marco,
Mark, do you have some advice about OSM tagging for address search?
If a road has a name or reference it will have an entry in the address
search data structure. It needs also to have a city associated with it
which can either be the nearest city (town, village, etc.) or the
road can
know if it may help you: If I search for a city (any city), it doesn't
find any city.
Ciao.
--- Sab 13/6/09, Mark Burton ma...@ordern.com ha scritto:
Da: Mark Burton ma...@ordern.com
Oggetto: Re: [mkgmap-dev] route recalculation senstivity bug found
A: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Data
16 matches
Mail list logo
