Hi,
I was wondering what is the difference between --remove-short-arcs and
--reduce-point-density. Their description differs (short-arcs says it
removes things that cause routing problems, while point-density seems
some sort of general simplification), but I'd think that using
Hi!
When a house number is mapped in osm as a POI, I can see the house
number in my device but when it is mapped in a polygon (e.g.with
building=yes) the POI is rendered but I can see just the word Punkt as
additional information.
Should I add something in the polygons file?
Thanks a lot in
Hi list,
I use the following style rules to add more information to the names of
mountain peaks:
natural=peak ele ~'[\d\s]*m' {name '${name} (${ele})' | 'Peak
(${ele})'} [0x6616 resolution 20]
natural=peak ele ~'[\d\s]*ft' {name '${name} (${ele})'| 'Peak
(${ele})'} [0x6616 resolution 20]
On 29.04.2010 18:57, Charlie Ferrero wrote:
Hi list,
I use the following style rules to add more information to the names of
mountain peaks:
natural=peak ele ~'[\d\s]*m' {name '${name} (${ele})' | 'Peak
(${ele})'} [0x6616 resolution 20]
natural=peak ele ~'[\d\s]*ft' {name '${name}
On 29/04/10 11:25, Valentijn Sessink wrote:
I was wondering what is the difference between --remove-short-arcs and
--reduce-point-density. Their description differs (short-arcs says it
removes things that cause routing problems, while point-density seems
some sort of general simplification),
On 29/04/2010 18:04, Felix Hartmann wrote:
On 29.04.2010 18:57, Charlie Ferrero wrote:
Hi list,
I use the following style rules to add more information to the names of
mountain peaks:
natural=peak ele ~'[\d\s]*m' {name '${name} (${ele})' | 'Peak
(${ele})'} [0x6616 resolution 20]
El 29/04/10 20:34, Charlie Ferrero escribió:
Hi Marko or others,
I have some suggestions for the default style which I think improve the
naming of various sports-related things, of hotels, and of tourist
information POIs:
[Polygons style file]
leisure=stadium {name '${name} (${sport})' |
For most people understanding which mkgmap options they should choose,
is not easy - as one first needs to have quite thorough understanding. I
think in general useful options should be the default - and not stick
for ages to old behavior. I'm afraid I make to many mistakes if I change
it
Yes i understand you, but you me not :-)
I describe you my situation again:
I want to create gmapsupp.img from OSM file but i want to change colors in
generated gmapsupp.img.i want to have only one map, so something like ID is
not important for me.i try edit TYP file and there is map id 2200. can
