Hi Piotr, reg. multipile cities: I'm sorry, it seems I no longer understand the code in mkgmap :( In fact it seems I somehow lost my ability to understand and handle complex problems, probably it's time for me to stop doing this.
My first patch works as intended but doesn't change the output as expected. I thought that mkgmap can handle roads with multiple cities but you seem to be right that this only works when the cities are encoded with the house numbers. I've no idea what mkgmap should write for your input and our tools to analyse the GMP format are too poor as well. Maybe cgpsmapper creates fake house numbers for the additional cities? Reg. [Sign]: I might look at this again in the winter. Right now I prefer to cycle and do some OSM mapping. ciao, Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Oktober 2022 09:34 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Indexing street belonging to two cities Hi Piotr, it seems I already worked on the [Sign] stuff in 2016, see https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2016q1/024703.html I have no idea why I stopped at that time, but it means that I was wrong when I wrote that we already know how to write the [Sign] data. I've confused that with the method how we write destination hints. I'll start again to look at the data from Andrzej. Reg. multiple cities for one road: My patch only handles the @ in city names. The manual shows that this trick can also be used for RegionName. I have to add some more code to handle this in the way documented in the manual. Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Piotr Wawrzyniak <wopo...@gmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 17. Oktober 2022 16:11 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Indexing street belonging to two cities pon., 17 paź 2022 o 15:50 Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> napisał(a): > well, GPSMapEdit says it is NT format, and for the existence of the sub type > GMP means NT format. Well, it might be alike from index point of view, but I am sure that the whole NT, have never been decoded. > Anyhow, I might find a way to work around that. That could be awesome, if you need any additional data, please let me know, I will try to prepare specific data if you wish. > Do you know what the data starting with HLevel0 is about? I cannot find that > in the cGPSmapper > manual version 2.5 You can ignore it, it is extension from navitel, and it is used in the source code for bridges depiction. In general it shows level: -1 mean tunel, +1 etc mean above surface. > I've also noticed that mkgmap ignores the key Routeparam because it expects > RouteParam. > I guess it should ignore case as with some other key words? Yes, mkgmap ignores Routparam, but it is not an issue at all, as I am preprocessing source for mkgmap. It might be that cgpmapper is not case sensitive at all, but I would need to check it. Should I? Routeparam is a result of another software, that prepares mp for cgpamapper. It creates routing data (nodes), restrictions, signs and balances routing classes. But apparently cgpamapper accepts Routeparam as well. Piotr _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk https://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
