On 26/09/10 22:58, Greg Troxel wrote:
I'm seeing comits to what I think is the same mkgmap svn with different
version numbers. So am I just missing something obvious, or is there
something unusual going on, or ??
Version 1707 was commited by steve on 2010-09-26 21:23:54 +0100 (Sun, 26
Torsten Leistikow (de_m...@gmx.de) wrote:
WanMil schrieb am 24.09.2010 19:29:
My understanding of the multipolygons is, that the tags may EITHER be
in the
relation OR on the outer polygons. So the outerpoylgons are only to be
used,
when there are no tags on the relation.
If the relation
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 15:20:
As an example take a nature reserve consisting of a wood with a lake inside.
This migth be mapped with two polygons and a relation:
polygon A: leisure=nature_reserve (the complete area)
polygon B: natural=water (only the inner area)
Torsten Leistikow (de_m...@gmx.de) wrote:
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 15:20:
As an example take a nature reserve consisting of a wood with a
lake inside.
This migth be mapped with two polygons and a relation:
polygon A: leisure=nature_reserve (the complete area)
polygon B:
char...@cferrero.net schrieb am 27.09.2010 16:49:
OK, but in practical terms if mkgmap generated a nature reserve
polygon, a wood multipolygon and an inner water polygon, wouldn't the
visible results be undefined? In other words, you could end up with
either:
a) Wood multipolygon
