Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Could you upload a broken example so I can see exactly what is
in the file.
At the moment unfortunately not: This Heisenbug vanished yesterday in my
maps.(Without doing anything regarding region or else) just with a new
oberbayern.osm and a slightly modified
On 19/07/10 23:04, Daniela Duerbeck wrote:
Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
I do not think so. It is a very strange bug. It changes for example
even, if the osm file, the styles, the mkgmap etc. remain the same and
just the typ file is changed.
That kind of points to the problem being in the TYP
Hi Clinton!
Hm... with my Geofabrik extract and Mkgmap 1652 I get the following:
Rablstrasse 45
81669, München, DE, DE
Which, aside from the DE, DE part, seems to be correct. I'll try updating
mkgmap and recompiling to see if that makes a difference.
If it does not make a difference,
Hi Markus,
I'm aware that this might be my view on the issue only. I just feel in a
project like this one, where the developer count is low, a solution (or an
approach thereof) in code is way quicker than involving developers
unnecessarily.
I try to contribute in other ways, e.g. I
I do not think so. It is a very strange bug. It changes for example
even, if the osm file, the styles, the mkgmap etc. remain the same and
just the typ file is changed.
That kind of points to the problem being in the TYP file - mkgmap
doesn't really do anything to modify
the TYP file, or
On Jul 19, 2010, at 20:02, Daniela Duerbeck wrote:
Hi Clinton!
Hm... with my Geofabrik extract and Mkgmap 1652 I get the following:
Rablstrasse 45
81669, München, DE, DE
Which, aside from the DE, DE part, seems to be correct. I'll try updating
mkgmap and recompiling to see if that
Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
I do not think so. It is a very strange bug. It changes for example
even, if the osm file, the styles, the mkgmap etc. remain the same and
just the typ file is changed.
That kind of points to the problem being in the TYP file - mkgmap
doesn't really do
On 07/17/2010 06:30 PM, Markus wrote:
I'm only marginally involved in this project myself and cannot speak for
it, but on a developer mailing list, it's generally quite impolite to only
come up with problems and expect others to solve them.
As far as I can tell there is no extra mkgmap-users
which is all fine. I've no idea where the rest of it comes from, were
you using some option that attempts to fill in town/state information?
No, there should be the city added: München.
81669 München would be correct. But to add the city was a former normal
behaviour of mkgmap.
This
On Jul 16, 2010, at 14:48, Daniela Duerbeck wrote:
Today, with mkgmap 1655 and current Oberbayern from Geofabrik
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/europe/germany/bayern/oberbayern.osm.bz2
I get:
Mitani
Rablstrasse 45
81669 Anzinger Siedlung 19
85560 Ebersberg
Hm... with my Geofabrik
Hi Markus!
You're obviously intimate with software development yourself. Thus it
would probably be more helpful to the project if you had a look into the
code proving your assumptions, before directing others where to look.
My problem is that I do not understand Java. I tried to read and
Daniela Duerbeck daniela.duerb...@gmx.de wrote on 16/07/2010 at 10:00:32 +1100
subject [mkgmap-dev] Strange strings in addresses (r1654) :
Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi
The info for the Restaurant Mitani is:
Mitani
Rablstrasse 45
81669 G 18 85560 Ebersberg
So there seem to be some
Today, with mkgmap 1655 and current Oberbayern from Geofabrik
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/europe/germany/bayern/oberbayern.osm.bz2
I get:
Mitani
Rablstrasse 45
81669 Anzinger Siedlung 19
85560 Ebersberg
Dani
___
mkgmap-dev mailing list
And the behaviour changes when I use a different typ file.
My boyfriend had an idea: He said that these string errors normally are
caused by bad terminated strings how we know them from C-Programs, not
from Java.
So perhaps the img-file is somehow wrong built together causing the
internal
Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
I suspect that there is some trouble with addr: handling. See my post
on routing issues triggered by addr: tags
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/pipermail/mkgmap-dev/2010q3/008574.html
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] Routing issue caused by addr:street?
These problems may indeed
Hi
The info for the Restaurant Mitani is:
Mitani
Rablstrasse 45
81669 G 18 85560 Ebersberg
So there seem to be some problems with strings.
I downloaded the area. I see:
Mitani
Rablstrasse 45
81669
which is all fine. I've no idea where the rest of it comes from, were
you using
16 matches
Mail list logo
