[mlpack] Work Report GSoC 2021

Hello mlpack, It seems like GSoC is ending but for me, this is the start of something awesome, something I am gonna love soo much. In the meet-up yesterday when Marcus said that we don't consider mlpack as work but something that we love to do, I want that feeling when I code. Seeing Ryan

[mlpack] GSoC Update

Hello mlpack, This is my GSoC blog: https://heisenbuug.github.io/ Nothing fancy just a dairy of updates and my experiences. We are nearly done with removing boost::spirit. In fact, we already deleted the `Load.cpp` file which contains `boost::spirit` code. All we need to do is do a bit of

[mlpack] GSoC Blog Update

Hello mlpack, Here's my GSoC blog update: https://heisenbuug.github.io/ I will make an update soon regarding 1-month experience. Regards. Gopi. ___ mlpack mailing list mlpack@lists.mlpack.org http://knife.lugatgt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlpack

[mlpack] GSoC 2021 Project

Hey mlpack, Thank you for accepting my project for GSoC 2021. I am very excited to get started on this journey. Regards. Gopi M. Tatiraju ___ mlpack mailing list mlpack@lists.mlpack.org http://knife.lugatgt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlpack

Re: [mlpack] Issue with debugging

bugging. We use directly on gcc/g++ and > gdb for debugging. In the case of mlpack, you have CMake ready of you. > > For the OS, any Linux distros can have all of above editors and > compilers. > > Therefore, there is no need for IDE. > > Best, > Omar > > On 04/24, Gopi Man

Re: [mlpack] Issue with debugging

time, please let me know your thoughts. Regards Gopi On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 5:03 AM Ryan Curtin wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 10:59:57AM +0530, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hello mlpack, > > > > I use visual studio for mlpack development. I build mlpack and the

[mlpack] Issue with debugging

Hello mlpack, I use visual studio for mlpack development. I build mlpack and then link it using task.json and launch.jon files in vscode. I wrote this simple example: #include > #include "armadillo" > using namespace std; > int main() > { > arma::mat foo; > mlpack::data::DatasetInfo

Re: [mlpack] Regarding GSoC

, Gopi M. Tatiraju On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 5:08 PM Omar Shrit wrote: > Hello Gopi, > > Try to do your best and submit a draft as soon as possible so we can give > back a review. > > Best, > > Omar > > On 04/11, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hey, > > &g

Re: [mlpack] Issue using FastCSV

. Very excited to work on this project. Thanks, Gopi On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 7:44 AM Ryan Curtin wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 03:35:23PM +0530, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I am exploring some csv parsers. Link > > <https://github.com/ben-stra

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

the fast cpp, there is > no examples or clear doc, it requires reading the code directly. > I will let you know if I have anything. > > Best, > > Omar > > On 04/02, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Heyy, > > > > So I was not able to work out fast csv, but I

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

I am running the benchmark code, it's gonna take some time, so I will upload the code finishes compiling. Also, any idea regarding the other parser would help. Thanks, Gopi On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 12:47 AM Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > Hey, > > Was working on it. > Here's the link: &g

[mlpack] Issue using FastCSV

Hello, I am exploring some csv parsers. Link I went through the basic example: # include "csv.h" > int main(){ > io::CSVReader<3> in("ram.csv"); > in.read_header(io::ignore_extra_column, "vendor", "size", "speed"); > std::string vendor;

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

the > log and add the results to the open pull request to get a better > comparison? > > The code seems to be fine, it can be optimized, but I would wait to see > the plots. > > Thanks, > > Omar > > On 04/01, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hey Omar, > > &

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

er. > > Let me know what do you think, the benchmark will help us in doing better > choice, since this is the internal (private) API, and will not be used > by the user directly. > > These are my thoughts, let me know what do you think. > > Omar. > > On 04/01, Gopi Manoh

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

at can act as basic csv file loading in arma::mat, right? Thank You, Gopi On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 8:28 PM Omar Shrit wrote: > Hey Gopi > > On 03/29, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I agree, after going a bit through both the candidates I can see we c

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

ount of the summer. > > Thanks, > > Omar > > On 03/29, Ryan Curtin wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 04:17:35PM +0530, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > > Would love to hear your thoughts on whether to go with an already > > > implemented parser or build a new one

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

e of these. > > We can edit the examples and show basic > > data-processing using this new class. Once all the already implemented > > functionalities are utilized then we can go > > for implementing the new ones. > > > > Sorry for such a long mail, but I think the

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

these are some points that we should ponder about to go ahead with the idea. Egar to hear comments and suggestions. Thank you. Regards, Gopi On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 1:08 AM Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > Hey Ryan, > > Thanks for the feedback, I too looked at that issue you mentioned but &g

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

re: > > https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/issues/2646 > > Thanks, > > Ryan > > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:10:47PM +0530, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hey, > > > > Thank you for your quick response. > > > > So I can see that we have boo

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

have one .hpp file for load_csv. I will also check the compilation time before making these changes. Sounds good? Thanks, Gopi On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 8:30 PM Omar Shrit wrote: > On 03/22, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hey Omar, > > > > Thank you for the reply... >

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

considering this as base a starting from this point. Regards, Gopi On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 5:01 PM Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > Hey Marcus, > > Yes, you got it correct. We will have a single environment but we can have > multiple agents and reward schemes. I added more

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

AM Omar Shrit wrote: > Hello Gopi, > > Sorry, I am forgot to answer you earlier (A little bit busy), thanks for > the ping. > > On 03/18, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > Hey Omar, > > > > Thank you soo much for such detailed replies and inputs. > > > &g

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

hey can be done independently. You can choose what you > find the most suitable and build a proposal upon it allowing to have > the most possible decoupling between the tasks in order to maximize the > possible > feasibility of the project. > > I hope you find this helpful ! >

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

Let me know what you think. Thank you, Gopi On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 9:35 PM Ryan Curtin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 01:25:04AM +0530, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > > I am planning to contribute to mlapck under GSoC 2021. Currently, I am > > working on creating a pandas

Re: [mlpack] GSoC-2021

at I am planning regarding the > pre-processing tool. > > > Sounds good. > > Thanks, > Marcus > > > On 10. Mar 2021, at 01:09, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju > wrote: > > Heyy Marcus Edel, > > Thanks for your feedback. > > When we frame trading as an RL pro

[mlpack] Reinforcement Learning Gym

Hey, I saw that for reinforcement learning we are using *https://github.com/zoq/gym_tcp_api * which provides an infrastructure (TCP API) to the OpenAI Gym toolkit. I was wondering if mlpack is planning to implement its own environments? Like maybe we can start

Re: [mlpack] Regarding Proposal

Hey Marcus, Great, I will do that. Regards Stay Safe Gopi M Tatiraju On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 1:06 AM Marcus Edel wrote: > Hello, > > a link to the doc is fine. > > Thanks, > Marcus > > > On 30. Mar 2020, at 20:44, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju > wrote: > > >

[mlpack] Regarding Proposal

Hey mentors, I have a doubt regarding proposal. Actually my proposal contains some .gif files which depict the output. It works fine when uploaded on docs but when I save it as pdf it is converting them to still images, shall I put all those gif files in a google doc and link it? Is that ok? Or

Re: [mlpack] (no subject)

Hey Manav You can check mentor for respective projects here https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/wiki/SummerOfCodeIdeas Potential menotrs are listed for each project. Regards Gopi M Tatiraju On Thu, Mar 19, 2020, 17:37 MANAV KUMAR wrote: > Hello Mentors > I am Manav Kumar 3rd year Computers

Re: [mlpack] (no subject)

Hey Alina, You can submit the draft proposals via GSoC dashboard, mentors can directly provide you feedback there. You will see an option to submit proposal once you register on GSoC website. Regards Gopi M Tatiraju On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 3:24 PM Alina Boshchenko wrote: > Hello everyone! >

Re: [mlpack] GSoC 2020: Visualization Tool

as proposal submission is already open and I want to submit a detailed proposal. Project: https://github.com/mlpack/mlpack/wiki/SummerOfCodeIdeas#visualization-tool Mentor: Ryan Birmingham Mail-List: mlpack@lists.mlpack.org Regards. Gopi M Tatiraju On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 1:54 AM Gopi Manohar Tat

Re: [mlpack] GSoC 2020: Visualization Tool

? > > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 11:59 PM Gopi Manohar Tatiraju < > deathcod...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> Regarding Visualization Tool, I think we may need to use one or more >> different libraries to build it, so a discussion regarding the dependencies >

[mlpack] GSoC 2020: Visualization Tool

Hey, Regarding Visualization Tool, I think we may need to use one or more different libraries to build it, so a discussion regarding the dependencies is needed to proceed further. I took the example of Digit Recogniser and started working on

Re: [mlpack] GS0C 2020

oint? > > Let me know what you think. > > Thanks, > Marcus > > On 5. Mar 2020, at 17:25, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju > wrote: > > Hey Mentors, > > I just went through the idea page for GSoC 2020 Mlpack and found that this > project was added > https://

Re: [mlpack] GS0C 2020

of ANN Algorithms Implemented in mlpack. Regards. Gopi M Tatiraju On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 12:07 PM Gopi Manohar Tatiraju wrote: > Hey Marcus, > I agree that we should focus on one topic only, I am more interested in > Segmentation Models. > > I started implementing SegNet(https://gi

[mlpack] Regarding Implementation of SqeeuzeNet

Hey Marcus, Regarding SqueezeNet, I read about the model and saw some implementation of the model in Python using Keras. There the model is implemented using Tensors. The input is taken as keras.engine.input_layer.Input() I was not able to find a way to

Re: [mlpack] Regular mlpack video chats (in 2020)

Hey, Whats the purpose of video chat? Is it casual or like some seminar? Gopi M Tatiraju On Wed, Mar 4, 2020, 18:19 Ryan Curtin wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Let's have another video meetup. :) > > What we've found over the past couple of weeks is that Wednesday at 2200 > UTC isn't actually a

Re: [mlpack] Gsoc 20

Oh, good to hear. Regards. Gopi M Tatiraju On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 7:15 PM Tanvi Agarwal wrote: > Thank you for your response. I was not able to setup armadillo dependency > in my system. Now I have resolved this. > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:30 PM deathcoderx wrote: > >> Hey Tanvi, >> I am

Re: [mlpack] GS0C 2020

ze part, the cool thing about the models repo is, we > don't have > to care so much about dependencies, so if you think OpenCV is the best > option, > fine with me. > > Thanks, > Marcus > > On 28. Feb 2020, at 15:25, Gopi Manohar Tatiraju > wrote: > > Hey, > R

[mlpack] GS0C 2020

Hey, Regarding adding more models in Mlpack, you are already familiar with my basic idea. I have already started working on it and by now I have a good idea about the functionality and architecture of Mlpack library. https://github.com/mlpack/models/issues/54 Regarding the proposal are there any