Curtin <r...@ratml.org>
Sent: 02 April 2018 16:18:17
To: LI Xuran
Cc: mlpack@lists.mlpack.org
Subject: Re: [mlpack] MVU Bug Fix GSOC
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 08:23:20PM +, LI Xuran wrote:
> >I took a quick look at your proposal and I think it is relatively clear
> >and sufficient
ut this
shouldn't be hard.
And currently I don't think any further constraints to the SDP class are needed.
Best Regards
Daniel Li
From: Ryan Curtin <r...@ratml.org>
Sent: 04 April 2018 20:53:52
To: LI Xuran
Cc: mlpack@lists.mlpack.org
Subject: Re: [mlpack]
Hi Ryan,
>I took a quick look at your proposal and I think it is relatively clear
>and sufficiently detailed. I am not clear on exactly what you mean by
>"5. it might also be useful to write an algorithm to pre-process the
>dataset to make it smoother and convex"---note that the LRSDP
on that sample
4.(or maybe datasets with a special property such that it should always
converge by an implementation of MVU + LRSDP and check if the expected result
is met )
do you think any of the above ideas worth a try?
Thanks!
Daniel Li
From: LI Xuran
Sent: 17
Hello Ryan,
I am Daniel Li, a second-year student studying Artificial in the University of
Edinburgh. I write fluent c++ code and is interested in taking up the quest to
fix bugs regarding MVU and semidefinite programming in mlpack. I've read about
scalable semidefinite manifold learning and
suggestion.
Best Wishes,
Daniel Li
From: LI Xuran
Sent: 18 March 2018 20:15:57
To: mlpack@lists.mlpack.org
Subject: Re: MVU Bug Fix GSOC
Dear Ryan,
I am currently working on my proposal for the Fixes to MVU and low-rank
semidefinite programs and have come up
