Re: [Mlt-devel] YUYV422 vs UYVY422

2016-10-16 Thread Maksym Veremeyenko
On 16.10.2016 22:53, Dan Dennedy wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:52 AM Maksym Veremeyenko > wrote: > > Hi, > > what was historical reason to select default packed format YUYV422 > instead of UYVY422? > > > The bluefish consumer - MLT's

Re: [Mlt-devel] YUYV422 vs UYVY422

2016-10-16 Thread Dan Dennedy
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:52 AM Maksym Veremeyenko wrote: > Hi, > > what was historical reason to select default packed format YUYV422 > instead of UYVY422? > > The bluefish consumer - MLT's first, important consumer for the company sponsoring its initial development and was

[Mlt-devel] YUYV422 vs UYVY422

2016-10-16 Thread Maksym Veremeyenko
Hi, what was historical reason to select default packed format YUYV422 instead of UYVY422? i asking it because it is second consumer (decklink first, ndi is second) that support only UYVY422 format for frame. what do you think about changing it? or providing compile-time macro for defining