Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-21 Thread Maksym Veremeyenko
On 21.02.2016 21:25, Brian Matherly wrote: > What does width_type=none do? it does not apply any width scaling/cropping recently implemented and proposed. i can drop it and use width != 0 as enablers... > Does width_type=fit shrink the size? If so, how about "shrink" instead > of "fit"? because o

Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-21 Thread Brian Matherly
vel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented. On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:33 AM Maksym Veremeyenko wrote: On 20.02.2016 21:06, Dan Dennedy wrote: > I am not opposed to wrap_type, but can we avoid

Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-21 Thread Dan Dennedy
> ~BM > > -- > *From:* Dan Dennedy > *To:* Maksym Veremeyenko ; > mlt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > *Sent:* Sunday, February 21, 2016 12:19 PM > *Subject:* Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented. > > > On Sun, Feb 21, 2016

Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-21 Thread Dan Dennedy
On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:33 AM Maksym Veremeyenko wrote: > On 20.02.2016 21:06, Dan Dennedy wrote: > > I am not opposed to wrap_type, but can we avoid adding wrap_width? If > > so, then change wrap_type to simply "wrap" where 0 = no wrapping and +1 > > for all the other modes. > > i think it is

Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-21 Thread Maksym Veremeyenko
On 20.02.2016 21:06, Dan Dennedy wrote: > I am not opposed to wrap_type, but can we avoid adding wrap_width? If > so, then change wrap_type to simply "wrap" where 0 = no wrapping and +1 > for all the other modes. i think it is possible to combine all width limiting features into two properties:

Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-20 Thread Dan Dennedy
I am not opposed to wrap_type, but can we avoid adding wrap_width? If so, then change wrap_type to simply "wrap" where 0 = no wrapping and +1 for all the other modes. On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 10:42 AM Dan Dennedy wrote: > It seems wrong to keep adding more width-handling properties to pango. Is >

Re: [Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-20 Thread Dan Dennedy
It seems wrong to keep adding more width-handling properties to pango. Is it clear what happens (or should happen) when you combine their usage? Does it create a little puzzle? Do you really use all of these, or do you keep adding properties to try to achieve something and abandon other, recently a

[Mlt-devel] [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented.

2016-02-20 Thread Maksym Veremeyenko
Hi, attached patch implement wrapping feature setup for Pango producer -- Maksym Veremeyenko From 338eb0889125e39a8cd26c8c5077e14e9df8e60f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maksym Veremeyenko Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 19:43:03 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Wrapping customizing implemented. --- src/module