Re: AnonymousClassLoader overhaul

2008-04-23 Thread Rémi Forax
John Rose a écrit : > On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:15 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: > > >> The source code is available here: >> http://www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~forax/tmp/davinci-anonk.zip >> >> I've sent a previous message monday to the mlvm list but it seems it >> was rejected because its size was too large (cod

Re: AnonymousClassLoader overhaul

2008-04-23 Thread John Rose
On Apr 23, 2008, at 4:15 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: > The source code is available here: > http://www-igm.univ-mlv.fr/~forax/tmp/davinci-anonk.zip > > I've sent a previous message monday to the mlvm list but it seems it > was rejected because its size was too large (codes as attachment). > So i re-sent

Re: AnonymousClassLoader overhaul

2008-04-23 Thread Rémi Forax
John Rose a écrit : > On Apr 19, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Rémi Forax wrote: > >> Hi all, >> there are several changes, i would like to apply on >> AnonymousClassLoader: >> - make a clean separation between the classloader, the constant pool >> parser and >> the patch array. >> - avoid to iterate over

Re: Da Vinci MLVM: Interest for an very old language running on an extended JVM

2008-04-23 Thread John Rose
On Apr 18, 2008, at 3:34 AM, Francis ANDRE wrote: >> The performance story is better too, since whether it's a bytecode or >> subroutine, you may have to wait for the compiler team to cook up the >> desired optimizations, but it's usually a shorter wait for the >> subroutine. And now that we are