Additional late-night thoughts about ACL and dynamic invocation.
Obviously when I mentioned that in JRuby we'd use ACL to reduce handle
generation cost, I neglected to mention that that would only be the case
until the actual method handle API lands. That is assuming we'd be able
to provide eno
Rémi Forax wrote:
> I've perhaps found why there is no difference in your test.
> I've re-read the code of your ruby Classoader and someting is weird,
> the last instruction of the static block should be
Some actual numbers now, showing difference.
The test instantiates 100k new Ruby methods and
Hi all,
looks like I finally managed to join this list too. And I already have a
request to those making the adminitrative part here.. Is it possible to
let the mailing list server set a reply-to for the list? That would make
things a bit more easy.
bye blackdrag
--
Jochen "blackdrag" Theodor
Rémi Forax wrote:
> I've perhaps found why there is no difference in your test.
> I've re-read the code of your ruby Classoader and someting is weird,
> the last instruction of the static block should be
>
> ANONYMOUS_SUPPORTED = true;
> and not
> ANONYMOUS_SUPPORTED = false;
Good lord, you're ri
Charles Oliver Nutter a écrit :
> Rémi Forax wrote:
>> In my opinion, there is one AnonymousClassloader by host class to
>> share security check.
>
> I'm not sure I see how to use a single java.dyn.AnonymousClassLoader
> to load multiple classes, since it seems to want the class bytes on
> const
Rémi Forax wrote:
> In my opinion, there is one AnonymousClassloader by host class to share
> security check.
I'm not sure I see how to use a single java.dyn.AnonymousClassLoader to
load multiple classes, since it seems to want the class bytes on
construction. Looking at source now.
> Else, wh
