Good to see your neck is better!
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Paul Phillips wrote:
> You are quite right, the whole java.dyn package wasn't being built. I will
> guess that when the mlvm
> patches were last tested, the make system built whatever files it found - but
> now it only builds w
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 05:37:35PM +0100, Iulian Dragos wrote:
> To clarify this point: doing an (what I think) exhaustive search
> through all jars in the output directory yields no CallSite.class, or
> anything in the java.dyn package. Those source files exist in
> sources/jdk.
You are quite rig
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Iulian Dragos wrote:
> Now I feel even stupider, as I have a 'java' command that accepts
> '-XX:+InvokeDynamic' (yay!), but I can't find java.dyn.Dynamic & co
> anywhere. The example John sent on this list
> (http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/mlvm-dev/2008-Aug
Cc'ed the list.
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Paul Phillips wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:09:27PM +0100, Iulian Dragos wrote:
>> I'm trying to build a version of JDK7 with invoke dynamic support.
>
> Hey Iulian. Me too. Unfortunately I took on the added excitement of trying
> to do it
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 12:09:27PM +0100, Iulian Dragos wrote:
> I'm trying to build a version of JDK7 with invoke dynamic support.
Hey Iulian. Me too. Unfortunately I took on the added excitement of trying to
do it on OS X,
where the main bsd-ports tree is broken, so I have to apply an additi
I'm trying to build a version of JDK7 with invoke dynamic support. So
far, I managed to build the 'base' jdk7, but had no success applying
the required patches to get mlvm. I've been trying for 2 days before
giving up and seeking help.
I followed the instructions found in the patches/README file.
