Changeset: 6de49f01c9f0
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-01-20 23:10 -0800
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/langtools/rev/6de49f01c9f0
temporary patch from Jon Gibbons for NetBeans 6.5
+ gibbons.patch
+ gibbons.txt
! series
Changeset: 767977c02b54
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-
On 20.01.09 12:13, John Rose wrote:
> I run all my development builds on x86 Solaris, using VMWare on
> MacBook. (VirtualBox doesn't support 64-bit yet, but I'm watching
> for it.)
Experimental support for 64 bit guests on 32 bit systems has been added in
Virtualbox 2.1.0. I haven't tried that
On Jan 20, 2009, at 2:59 AM, Tobias Ivarsson wrote:
> I now feel that I have managed to map out the design of most things
> on the C++ level. Many aspects will be implemented in Java, but
> those are easier to change in a later iteration.
Excellent!
As part of the method handle work, I've re
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Patrick Wright wrote:
> John
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> > 5. encourage the great work that people are doing or will do on tail
> > call, continuations, interface injection, invokedynamic, etc.
> > (Cheers, Arnold, Lukas, Tobias, Remi.)
>
> It would be great to
On Jan 20, 2009, at 2:32 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
the meth patch doesn't seem to work.
Is this patch against the rev jdk7-b42 of the jdk7 workspace ?
Actually, it's against f6c0827e5919 which is the current contents of
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot/hotspot .
I suppose I need to put
On Jan 20, 2009, at 2:28 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
MethodHandle supports was almost ready before John changes the
format of
MethodType
(to add varargs bits)
Aghh! Stub out the varargs bits if you want; after using them a
little I'm beginning to think they are not worth the trouble. Sorry
f
John Rose a écrit :
> As you may have noticed, I just pushed a new patch set for method
> handles. This closes off a coding sprint (or hike or ramble?) that
> began in early December. The main visible results are a more mature
> javadoc API (draft--draft--draft!) and a bunch of unit tests.
Patrick Wright a écrit :
> John
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
>
>> 5. encourage the great work that people are doing or will do on tail
>> call, continuations, interface injection, invokedynamic, etc.
>> (Cheers, Arnold, Lukas, Tobias, Remi.)
>>
>
> It would be great to get an update on how
John
Thanks for the update.
> 5. encourage the great work that people are doing or will do on tail
> call, continuations, interface injection, invokedynamic, etc.
> (Cheers, Arnold, Lukas, Tobias, Remi.)
It would be great to get an update on how these sub-projects are
going, what they are (curre
As you may have noticed, I just pushed a new patch set for method
handles. This closes off a coding sprint (or hike or ramble?) that
began in early December. The main visible results are a more mature
javadoc API (draft--draft--draft!) and a bunch of unit tests. The
unit tests, even thou
10 matches
Mail list logo
