Re: progress: indy.patch -> JDK7

John Rose wrote: > The majority of indy.patch has entered the JDK7 VM at my workgroup's > integration repo, today at about 4:00AM PDT: >http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/be93aad57795 > > More to come, as we hammer on the spec, Java API, and initial apps. Big congratul

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: indy: move platform-specific code from meth.patch into indy-$arch.patch

Changeset: 40852f028895 Author:jrose Date: 2009-04-22 20:43 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/40852f028895 indy: move platform-specific code from meth.patch into indy-$arch.patch ! indy-amd64.patch ! indy-sparc.patch ! indy.patch ! meth.patch ! series ___

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: indy: update patch repo consistently with today's push to JDK7 of 6655646

Changeset: 5cb83bb7bf49 Author:jrose Date: 2009-04-22 19:13 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/5cb83bb7bf49 indy: update patch repo consistently with today's push to JDK7 of 6655646 ! indy-6655646.patch < indy.patch + indy-amd64.patch + indy-sparc.patch + i

progress: indy.patch -> JDK7

The majority of indy.patch has entered the JDK7 VM at my workgroup's integration repo, today at about 4:00AM PDT: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/hotspot-comp/hotspot/rev/be93aad57795 More to come, as we hammer on the spec, Java API, and initial apps. -- John

Re: London group looking at "perl" on the MLVM

Hi I saw the announcement and your slides; wondering if you'd been in touch with Bradley Kuhn? He was looking at this [1] several years ago. Apart from his thesis, I remember coming across a number of posts by him on Kawa and Perl mailing lists, if I'm not mistaken. Regards Patrick 1: http://ww

London group looking at "perl" on the MLVM

Hi, A small group of developers in London are starting to look at implementing a version of perl on the MLVM. We're aware that we're likely to have both syntactic and semantic issues (due to perl's somewhat idiosyncratic nature) but we thought we'd try anyway, and just see how far we can get and w

Re: thanks, and MOP stuff

On 2009.04.22., at 9:29, John Rose wrote: > Thanks, Attila, for jumping in with the MVLM build stuff. Well, I needed it, and once built, it's a no-brainer to put it out there, so... > The bulk of the meth and indy bits are moving slowly but surely into > the regular JDK7 builds, so I expect

thanks, and MOP stuff

Thanks, Attila, for jumping in with the MVLM build stuff. The bulk of the meth and indy bits are moving slowly but surely into the regular JDK7 builds, so I expect the delta between JDK7 and MLVM will decrease rapidly. Note that most of meth.patch is now integrated in http://hg.openjdk.java