Re: findVirtual problem

2009-08-18 Thread John Rose
On Aug 18, 2009, at 6:07 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: > Hi Christian, > > do an upcast > > String result = mh.invoke((Object) "foo"); Yes. The difference between the two call sites is: (Ljava/lang/String;)Ljava/lang/String; vs. (Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/String; The actual (erased)

Re: Throwable

2009-08-18 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote: > The language compiler complains about an > unreported exception Throwable; must be caught or declared to be thrown > in using both InvokeDynamic and the (invisible) MethodHandle.invoke() > > Why is this so? > What about an (unchecked) Ru

Re: Inlining

2009-08-18 Thread Christian Thalinger
Raffaello Giulietti wrote: > * Is there a special -XX: flag to turn on inlining of methods invoked > via method handles? > * Or must something be enabled during the build of mlvm? No, inlining is enabled by default. Currently only DMH invokes are inlined, but I'm working on inlining the rest. Ar

Inlining

2009-08-18 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
* Is there a special -XX: flag to turn on inlining of methods invoked via method handles? * Or must something be enabled during the build of mlvm? Thanks Raffaello ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/l

Throwable

2009-08-18 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
The language compiler complains about an unreported exception Throwable; must be caught or declared to be thrown in using both InvokeDynamic and the (invisible) MethodHandle.invoke() Why is this so? What about an (unchecked) RuntimeException instead? __

Re: findVirtual problem

2009-08-18 Thread Raffaello Giulietti
Christian Thalinger wrote: > Attila Szegedi wrote: >> Shouldn't that be >> >> mh.invoke("foo") >> >> ? It returns a String and takes an Object. > > No, the syntax is correct. A MethodHandle invoke only specifies the > return type. > > -- Christian > __

Re: findVirtual problem

2009-08-18 Thread Christian Thalinger
Attila Szegedi wrote: > Shouldn't that be > > mh.invoke("foo") > > ? It returns a String and takes an Object. No, the syntax is correct. A MethodHandle invoke only specifies the return type. -- Christian ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.jav

Re: findVirtual problem

2009-08-18 Thread Attila Szegedi
Shouldn't that be mh.invoke("foo") ? It returns a String and takes an Object. Attila. On 2009.08.18., at 10:55, Christian Thalinger wrote: > MethodHandle mh = MethodHandles.lookup().findVirtual(Object.class, > "toString", MethodType.make(String.class)); > String result = mh.invoke("foo");

findVirtual problem

2009-08-18 Thread Christian Thalinger
Hi! Looks like there is a problem with findVirtual. Since I don't know very much about the MethodHandle Java level, I want to be sure it's not my fault. Doing: MethodHandle mh = MethodHandles.lookup().findVirtual(Object.class, "toString", MethodType.make(String.class)); String result = mh.i