Re: Good news, bad news

2011-05-24 Thread John Rose
On May 24, 2011, at 10:25 PM, Ola Bini wrote: > I don't use permuteArguments anywhere in my code, actually, but maybe > one of the other combinators is defined in terms of it? No, it's stand-alone. Factoid: All the other combinators are order-stable with respect to arguments. I toyed with using

Re: Good news, bad news

2011-05-24 Thread Ola Bini
On 2011-05-25 10.50, John Rose wrote: > On May 23, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Ola Bini wrote: > >> Have you seen any reason why that happens? > > There are some known problems (crashers even) with method handle > compilation. > > The permuteArguments transform has a bug when you mix long/doubles > and ot

Re: Good news, bad news

2011-05-24 Thread John Rose
On May 23, 2011, at 7:33 PM, Ola Bini wrote: > Have you seen any reason why that happens? There are some known problems (crashers even) with method handle compilation. The permuteArguments transform has a bug when you mix long/doubles and other argument types. I have a crasher in one of my "di

Re: Good news, bad news

2011-05-24 Thread John Rose
On May 23, 2011, at 5:43 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > Well I have a prototype GWT in place, but I'm having trouble getting > invokeExact to work. As far as I can tell, incoming arguments should > match the handle type just fine, but I'm getting this error: Hmm... I don't see the bug in you

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth: update spec; factor out deprecated methods; fix guardWithTest

2011-05-24 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: b3d741bcbbe5 Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-24 22:11 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/b3d741bcbbe5 meth: update spec; factor out deprecated methods; fix guardWithTest ! meth-argcount-6983728.patch + meth-deprecate.patch ! meth-review-7032323.patch ! me

Re: Good news, bad news

2011-05-24 Thread Ola Bini
Hi, There are at least three problems that are still there. They might be connected, or not. (I will tell you how to reproduce these at the end) I just built a new JVM: openjdk version "1.7.0-internal" OpenJDK Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-internal-olabini_2011_05_25_08_06-b00) OpenJDK Server

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth: more compatibility methods in meth.patch

2011-05-24 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 2d0e7ec999e8 Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-24 12:37 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/2d0e7ec999e8 meth: more compatibility methods in meth.patch ! meth.patch ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth: put compatibility methods into meth.patch

2011-05-24 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: 96df9e16d586 Author:jrose Date: 2011-05-24 12:19 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/96df9e16d586 meth: put compatibility methods into meth.patch ! meth-doc-7014005.2.patch ! meth.patch ___ mlvm-dev mailing

Re: Good news, bad news

2011-05-24 Thread Tom Rodriguez
I haven't been able to reproduce a crash that looks like either of the issues you reported, the ShouldNotReachHere in frame.cpp and the crash in FastScanClosure. Do you have a test that can reproduce it and are you running against the latest version of the code? tom On May 23, 2011, at 7:33 P

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: coro: small fix to make coro-standalone.patch apply cleanly

2011-05-24 Thread lukas . stadler
Changeset: 6f539545926f Author:Lukas Stadler Date: 2011-05-24 16:01 +0200 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/6f539545926f coro: small fix to make coro-standalone.patch apply cleanly ! coro-standalone.patch ___ mlvm-de