Sorry, I'm away till August 1st.
For urgent matters, please contact David.Therkelsen
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
Hello,
I'm following this mailing list for a while now, and I'm really amazed by
what this new API can do. However, until recently, I was convinced it would
only be useful for scripting languages ("only" is not the right word here of
course). But I discovered that it seemed to be very simple to us
Remi,
OK - that is quite amazing!
Thanks for the explanation.
- AJ
On 10 July 2011 11:29, Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 07/10/2011 10:14 AM, Alexander Turner wrote:
>> John,
>>
>> Thanks for your fascinating reply. I would just like to clarify something:
>>
>> "
>> Another use case which benefits fro
On 07/10/2011 10:14 AM, Alexander Turner wrote:
> John,
>
> Thanks for your fascinating reply. I would just like to clarify something:
>
> "
> Another use case which benefits from this particular optimization
> trick is "static final" method handles. I.e., if you want to get
> invokedynamic-like p
John,
Thanks for your fascinating reply. I would just like to clarify something:
"
Another use case which benefits from this particular optimization
trick is "static final" method handles. I.e., if you want to get
invokedynamic-like performance in plain Java code, consider doing your
work by inv
