Hi Mark,
On 3 April 2012 00:40, Mark Roos wrote:
> Hi Martijn
>
> If the effort meets my needs I'll be there to help. My goal is a full
> implementation
> of Smalltalk on the JVM. One thing I need is the ability to manipulate a
> suspended
> thread from the object side. For this Lukas' work s
Hi Martizn
If the effort meets my needs I'll be there to help. My goal is a full
implementation
of Smalltalk on the JVM. One thing I need is the ability to manipulate a
suspended
thread from the object side. For this Lukas' work seems a good fit.
My concern is that (as John Rose points out )
Hi Lukas
A question I have on your coro implementation is just how sensitive it
is to changes in HotSpot. I am planning to give it a go and am wondering
if I need to be a Hotspot expert as well ( in case it breaks ).
On the same topic I recall that you build a small object code piece to
give
ac
> In this case I think the suitable thing to do would be to coordinate work
> around
> your existing patch via some sort of OSS project and look at all of the
> aspects
> that would need to be covered in order for it to be accepted into the
> OpenJDK.
> For example, a lot of thought will need to go
Hi Lukas/Charlie,
Basically we're trying to get more people involved in the OpenJDK as well
as
helping projects like coroutines get into a good shape for possible
inclusion into
the OpenJDK. This includes helping out with JEP and JSR processes as a
project matures.
In this case I think the suitab
Getting coro into JDK8 is obviously not possible now, but the sooner
we get started the more likely we can shoot for JDK9. That needs
people with cycles. I have some, and I'm willing to help, but I do not
know how the JSR process works (yes, I should learn) and I'm not
enough of a VM-level expert t
Hi,
I've last updated the coro patch beginning of December, and people have
been compiling and using it at least mid-February.
It is quite experimental, but it's complete enough to prove the
usefulness of coroutines on a JVM.
One important step towards coroutines on Java is a JSR, I guess...
On Mar 29, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 7:31 PM, John Rose wrote:
>
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>
>>> John, I think there is a bug in MacroAssembler::check_method_handle_type
>>> for x86 (with meth-lazy):
>>
>> That's co
