How about this one?
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8022718/webrev.01/
This version tests both versions of the modifiers for "public" --
ref.getModifiers apparently sets public in some cases where the other one does
not.
Not 100% sure what those cases are, I suspect arrays from the cryptic
On Oct 9, 2013, at 11:49 AM, David Chase wrote:
> bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022718
>
> webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8022718/webrev.00/
>
> Problem: Needed implementation for change to the spec for JVM behavior (from
> the bug report):
>
>> JSR 335 spec, cha
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8022718
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~drchase/8022718/webrev.00/
Problem: Needed implementation for change to the spec for JVM behavior (from
the bug report):
> JSR 335 spec, chapter "15.28.2 Run-time Evaluation of Method References"
> conta
Not bad... I think I could manage that.
- Charlie
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Ben Evans wrote:
> How about a 1.5 day conference on Thursday 30th & morning of Friday 31st
> January?
>
> Then people who are coming to Europe for FOSDEM can arrive in London on
> Weds, have the language summit fo
