Hi Chris,
This is very nice. Are there plans to do this for the other existing tests as
well?
sure, but we didn't have enough time to do it in 8u20 timeframe. So I'd
like to push these changes 1st, since we need this to cover 'Speedup
catch exceptions'. Other tests will be rewrite later. I h
On Mar 24, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please review the patch:
>
> Problems:
> - MethodHandlesTest::testCatchException() doesn't provide enough testing of
> j.l.i.MethodHandles::catchException().
> - MethodHandlesTest contains more than 3k lines, an auxiliary code to
Here's a version with the new naming scheme:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~vlivanov/8037210/webrev.03.naming
I like existing naming scheme and OBJECT/VOID/LONG/etc names are quite
popular(e.g. Wrapper & ASM (Opcodes) use them). So, I'm in favor of
leaving it as is.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
