On 1/6/2013 6:52 AM, Noctarius wrote:
> Am 06.01.2013 11:35, schrieb BGB:
>> On 1/6/2013 3:19 AM, Noctarius wrote:
>>> Am 06.01.2013 00:44, schrieb John Rose:
>>>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think I prefer
On 1/6/2013 3:19 AM, Noctarius wrote:
> Am 06.01.2013 00:44, schrieb John Rose:
>> On Jan 5, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
>>
>>> I think I prefer a more general mechanism that ask javac to
>>> replace all access to fields (or methods) for a given class,
>>> insert an invokedynamic instead a
On 1/5/2013 2:20 PM, Noctarius wrote:
> Am 05.01.2013 20:44, schrieb BGB:
>> On 1/5/2013 12:37 PM, Noctarius wrote:
>>> Am 05.01.2013 19:15, schrieb BGB:
>>>> On 1/5/2013 10:17 AM, Noctarius wrote:
>>>>> Ok I took some time to make a deeper introducti
On 1/5/2013 12:37 PM, Noctarius wrote:
> Am 05.01.2013 19:15, schrieb BGB:
>> On 1/5/2013 10:17 AM, Noctarius wrote:
>>> Ok I took some time to make a deeper introduction in what I
>>> imagine to do:
>>> https://www.sourceprojects.org/default/2013/01/05
On 1/5/2013 10:17 AM, Noctarius wrote:
> Ok I took some time to make a deeper introduction in what I
> imagine to do:
> https://www.sourceprojects.org/default/2013/01/05/135739572.html
>
> As mentioned before it would be great if someone is interested in
> the topic and wants to help.
well, I
On 11/7/2012 7:02 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
> On 11/07/2012 11:30 PM, BGB wrote:
>> On 11/7/2012 4:15 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
>>> Hi John,
>>>
>>> Nice to see this effort moving forward. While reading the JEP, I
>>> can't help but think how com
On 11/7/2012 4:15 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
Hi John,
Nice to see this effort moving forward. While reading the JEP, I
can't help but think how complicated this sounds for JVM
implementors. Is introducing bytecodes and new value type
representation definitely a nonstarter? I'm thinking a
On 10/1/2012 1:26 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
From Charles
Have you taken a look at jnr-x86asm?
No, but I just bookmarked it to talk a look. I had been looking at
JNA as a way to connect to native
libs. Is there some way for me to locate/search for the jRuby native
handler code that uses jnr?
I
underneath, they were
largely built on the same core machinery.
or such...
Sent from my phone
On Sep 28, 2012 5:55 PM, "BGB" <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 9/28/2012 4:10 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
Since we're in wishful thinking territory now :), the
On 9/28/2012 4:10 PM, Vitaly Davidovich wrote:
Since we're in wishful thinking territory now :), the two things I'd
really like are:
1) value/struct types (i.e. avoid heap and be able to pack data closer
together). I don't how much we can rely on EA.
2) more auto-vectorization
I think 2 i
On 9/1/2012 6:30 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
I am looking to learn something here that I haven't seen in my code yet.
John mentioned
Suppose you are compiling your favorite high-level language to
the JVM, and you start
running into the various size limits in class files
To which ther
On 10/11/2011 2:03 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 08:58 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> I agree it would be an interesting language on the JVM. It may be the
>> "dynamic Java" I've wanted to make for a long time, with the added
>> bonus of optional static types.
>>
>> This could almost b
On 10/10/2011 8:42 PM, BGB wrote:
On 10/10/2011 6:56 PM, John Rose wrote:
On Oct 10, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Krystal Mok wrote:
It's cute when you can find DartEntry::InvokeDynamic(...) in Dart
VM's code [1] :-)
(Just for fun; doesn't imply any connection with JVM's invok
On 10/10/2011 6:56 PM, John Rose wrote:
On Oct 10, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Krystal Mok wrote:
It's cute when you can find DartEntry::InvokeDynamic(...) in Dart
VM's code [1] :-)
(Just for fun; doesn't imply any connection with JVM's invokedynamic)
It's not derivative, and not very surprising to me
On 12/31/2010 2:25 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
> On 12/28/2010 01:58 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Per Bothner wrote:
>>> Is there a plan/consensus for how to handle "illegal" characters
>>> in identifiers? I'm primarily interested in the bytecode level,
>>> no
(sorry, I am not sure if this belongs on-list or not...).
- Original Message -
From: "John Rose" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Da Vinci Machine Project"
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2008 10:00 AM
Subject: Re: Source Code to Build invokedynamic.jar
> On Dec 10
pardon my ignorance, but is there any plan to allow dynamic slot/field
access?...
ok, I am starting out just implementing my own VM with little familiarity with
this framework in general (at this point I have little idea if it will actually
be compatible), my tweak was partly to add the abilit
so, this is the question thus far:
which particular idea of invokedynamic is most likely to be used?
from what I can gather, one plan is to use opcode 186 with a layout and args
the same as invokeinterface. informally, I have assumed this idea thus far.
mention was also given of using invokeinte
sorry again, just more me and ideas...
- Original Message -
From: "BGB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2008 10:12 AM
Subject: greetings here...
> well, ok, I will say I am new to this list, but am hoping for interesting
> conversations.
> s
well, ok, I will say I am new to this list, but am hoping for interesting
conversations.
sorry if in being new here, I am being an ignorant troll.
main reason:
well, mostly I am doing "my own thing", but if possible would like to be
operating within the confines of 'the community'.
I will admi
20 matches
Mail list logo
