On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Thanks for the link, Ismael. The "official possition" and estimated
> ETA is what I was looking for
Sure.
For whatever it's worth, I would imagine that the Eclipse people got
their information from an Oracle person. So, while you wait for
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Speaking of bleeding edge. Is there an ETA for java7 update 1 ? You
> know, to shut up all those "Java 7 is broken, don't use it"
> naysayers...
I read in an Eclipse status update that it would be out in October
(Eclipse uses Lucene for it
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Per Bothner wrote:
> FYI - I've posted in my blog benchmark results comparing
> runtime numbers for Java, Scala, Clojure, JRuby, and Kawa versions
"Scala was version 2.9.0.final."
This seems to be a mistake as the latest final release is 2.8.0
(although the third
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Y. Srinivas Ramakrishna
wrote:
> Patrick Wright wrote:
> ...
>>
>> Glad to hear that perm gen will eventually go away.
>
> Could you elaborate a little on why it would be nice if the
> perm gen went away? Where would you like its current contents
> (which ones, if
