Looks good. Thanks for caring for the unwary user (which i unwittingly
represented when i previously pointed out the admittedly somewhat
subjective naturalness of the stable negative sense compared with
the unstable positive sense).
-- ramki
On 6/3/2011 12:48 AM, John Rose wrote:
> http://cr.open
On 3/28/2011 1:20 PM, shanka@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Christian Thalinger<
> christian.thalin...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> -XX:+UseSerialGC. It seems my previous email didn't make it to the list.
>>
>
> This worked. Well sort of. The JVM doesn't crash because of a GC
You might try switching on heap verification to see if it finds any issues:-
-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions -XX:+VerifyBeforeGC -XX:+VerifyafterGC
-- ramki
On 3/26/2011 8:49 PM, shanka@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm trying to include invoke dynamic in Jython. Currently, I'm just focu
> ... perm gen ... go away.
Thanks for all the responses. The bottom line
appears to be: please do the needful in the JVM,
don't tell me (the user) to size the perm gen explicitly.
We'll investigate how we can make that happen.
thanks.
-- ramki
___
ml
Patrick Wright wrote:
...
>
> Glad to hear that perm gen will eventually go away.
Could you elaborate a little on why it would be nice if the
perm gen went away? Where would you like its current contents
(which ones, if any, specifically?) to be located and why?
thanks!
-- ramki
So it looks like something is causing the iteration over the oops in
an interpreter frame on a Java thread stack to fail, and this
happens prior to a GC (so GC is likely not screwing up here,
but rather perhaps the interpreter).
With those very general remarks, it's over to the MLVM cognoscenti :
