Le 16/09/2009 02:56, John Rose a écrit :
(Getting a round of EG work in before the Summit, so we'll have more
to talk about. :-)
[...]
Regarding the LDC proposal, it came to my attention that JSR 294
(Modularity) is planning to add new ConstantPool types as well. This
makes me very opposed t
(Getting a round of EG work in before the Summit, so we'll have more
to talk about. :-)
On Jul 15, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Daniel Heidinga wrote:
Regarding keeping MHs.methodType, it seems cleaner to keep the
MethodHandles factory and the MethodType factory separate. The
static import concerns ca
> *Date: *July 8, 2009 1:39:36 PM PDT
> *To: *jsr-292...@jcp.org <mailto:jsr-292...@jcp.org>
> *Subject: **Re: [jsr-292-eg] updated RI code and API javadoc*
> *Reply-To: *jsr-292...@jcp.org <mailto:jsr-292...@jcp.org>
>
> We've taken a look through the Javadoc a
gt; Begin forwarded message:
> From: Daniel Heidinga
> Date: July 8, 2009 1:39:36 PM PDT
> To: jsr-292...@jcp.org
> Subject: Re: [jsr-292-eg] updated RI code and API javadoc
> Reply-To: jsr-292...@jcp.org
>
> We've taken a look through the Javadoc and have some c
use case (or abuse case!) for
one of the features we are trying to decide on. Please weigh in!
-- John
Begin forwarded message:
From: Daniel Heidinga
Date: July 8, 2009 1:39:36 PM PDT
To: jsr-292...@jcp.org
Subject: Re: [jsr-292-eg] updated RI code and API javadoc
Reply-To: jsr-292...@jcp.org
