egisterBootstrapMethod(LangBaseClass.class,
> "bootstrap");
> }
>}
>
>class LangSubClass1 extends LangBaseClass {
>
> ...
>
>InvokeDynamic.foo();
>
>}
>
>class LangSubclass2 extends LangBaseClass {
>
>...
>
pMethod(LangBaseClass.class,
"bootstrap");
}
}
class LangSubClass1 extends LangBaseClass {
...
InvokeDynamic.foo();
}
class LangSubclass2 extends LangBaseClass {
...
InvokeDynamic.bar();
}
...
> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 16:01:00 +0200
>
Le 24/08/2010 15:36, Jim Laskey a écrit :
> Excuse me for being late in the game but I have a naïve question.
>
> Why not have the bootstrap method be inherited? Isn't it likely that a
> j-lang would have a base class and that often a common bootstrap might be
> used? (
Excuse me for being late in the game but I have a naïve question.
Why not have the bootstrap method be inherited? Isn't it likely that a j-lang
would have a base class and that often a common bootstrap might be used? (I'm
assuming it's an implementation/security issue, bu
