On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Tom Rodriguez wrote:
> Presumably that's a valid implementation of selectAlternative which seems to
> disallow these kinds of shenanigans at least until Java requires tail call
> elimination.
That was my expectation as well. It's a cute little case, since it's a
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:27 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> Right, it's a poll page read. test on x86 only sets flags according to the
> test. The Instruction Set Reference from Intel says:
>
> "Description
>
> Computes the bit-wise logical AND of first operand (source 1 operand) and the
> s
On Jul 27, 2011, at 2:50 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> I'm getting back into invokedynamic stuff (in between
> conferencing...whew!). Perf reports are coming soon, but in the
> interim
>
> I was playing with implementing "loops" using the trick Ola showed me
> of binding a call site in
On 07/27/2011 01:27 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Jul 27, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>>> I've just read your slides [1].
>>> I believe that the test before returning the result of add (slide 201)
>>> is a safepoint
On 07/27/2011 12:41 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> I've just read your slides [1].
>> I believe that the test before returning the result of add (slide 201)
>> is a safepoint check.
> Oh really? What is it doing with eax, though, since that
On Jul 27, 2011, at 12:41 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> I've just read your slides [1].
>> I believe that the test before returning the result of add (slide 201)
>> is a safepoint check.
>
> Oh really? What is it doing with eax, though,
On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> I've just read your slides [1].
> I believe that the test before returning the result of add (slide 201)
> is a safepoint check.
Oh really? What is it doing with eax, though, since that has the
result of the add operation?
- Charlie
__
On 07/27/2011 11:50 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> I'm getting back into invokedynamic stuff (in between
> conferencing...whew!). Perf reports are coming soon, but in the
> interim
I've just read your slides [1].
I believe that the test before returning the result of add (slide 201)
is a
I'm getting back into invokedynamic stuff (in between
conferencing...whew!). Perf reports are coming soon, but in the
interim
I was playing with implementing "loops" using the trick Ola showed me
of binding a call site in the chain and having it circle back to the
top. Fun, cute, etc.
https:/
