On 07/18/2012 12:55 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Jul 16, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Krystal Mok wrote:
>
>> And you're right that this has to do with the PermGen removal
>> project. The difference comes from [1], which is a part of CR 7017732.
>> To be specific, before the 7017732, static fields are stored in
On Jul 16, 2012, at 4:06 PM, Krystal Mok wrote:
> And you're right that this has to do with the PermGen removal project. The
> difference comes from [1], which is a part of CR 7017732.
> To be specific, before the 7017732, static fields are stored in the
> instanceKlass of a Java class; an insta
On 07/17/2012 01:06 AM, Krystal Mok wrote:
> Hi Remi,
>
> Looks like it's a trap if you're running this on JDK6's HotSpot VM. If
> you're running a debug build of the same VM, you should hit an
> assertion before hitting the ShouldNotReachHere() part.
>
> opto/type.cpp:2477
> assert(o->is_java_ob
Hi guys,
the latest jdk6 (jdk6 update 33) fails hard in the compiler if I try to
store the result of unsafe.staticFieldBase() in
a static final field, i.e if it's considered as a constant.
Neither recent jdk7 nor jdk8 crash, only jdk6 (it also failed with
update 21 which is the oldest version I h
