On May 27, 2011, at 1:21 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
> I'm sure Remi said that those two things were supposed to do the same
> thing. Now it seems invoker() is not as useful anymore.
>
> Or am I completely misunderstanding things here?
They are supposed to do the same thing, and (I hope) do the same thi
On 2011-05-27 13.40, John Rose wrote:
> On May 27, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
>
>>> Good. So what's the code that creates the target (not the
>>> fallback)? It looks like it has its types denatured to Object.
>>> -- John
>>
>> Actually, I was lying before - the code I inserted was not wh
On May 27, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
>> Good. So what's the code that creates the target (not the fallback)?
>> It looks like it has its types denatured to Object. -- John
>
> Actually, I was lying before - the code I inserted was not what crashes.
> This is the code that crashes:
Yes
On May 27, 2011, at 12:39 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
> invoker(type())
Recheck your assumptions about what invoker returns: That changed. You might
need to adjust:
invoker(type().generic())
or
invoker(type()).asType(...)
Or maybe there's a type.generic() elsewhere that can go away.
-- John
On 2011-05-27 12.59, John Rose wrote:
> On May 27, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
>
>> type() is just a call site type, so that will be the
>> SephObject,SThread etc.
>
>
> Good. So what's the code that creates the target (not the fallback)?
> It looks like it has its types denatured to Obj
On May 27, 2011, at 12:26 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
> type() is just a call site type, so that will be the SephObject,SThread etc.
Good. So what's the code that creates the target (not the fallback)? It looks
like it has its types denatured to Object. -- John
__
On 2011-05-27 12.53, John Rose wrote:
> On May 27, 2011, at 12:11 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
>
>> I ran the compile against what's in b144, but directly from the
>> JDK7 repo
>>
>> On 2011-05-27 12.26, John Rose wrote:
>>> On May 26, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>>>
Caused by: java.lang.Ille
On May 27, 2011, at 12:11 AM, Ola Bini wrote:
> I ran the compile against what's in b144, but directly from the JDK7 repo
>
> On 2011-05-27 12.26, John Rose wrote:
>> On May 26, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>>
>>> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: target and fallback types
>>>
I ran the compile against what's in b144, but directly from the JDK7 repo
On 2011-05-27 12.26, John Rose wrote:
> On May 26, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
>
>> It seems there is still a difference in how asType MHs work between what
>> is in current JDK7 repo, and what you get from building
On May 26, 2011, at 11:38 PM, Ola Bini wrote:
> It seems there is still a difference in how asType MHs work between what
> is in current JDK7 repo, and what you get from building bsdport with
> mlvm patches. Specifically, when running things with bsdport/mlvm they
> work. When running on JDK7 (bui
Hi,
It seems there is still a difference in how asType MHs work between what
is in current JDK7 repo, and what you get from building bsdport with
mlvm patches. Specifically, when running things with bsdport/mlvm they
work. When running on JDK7 (built about 30 minutes ago) I get this:
Caused by: j
11 matches
Mail list logo
