Christian --
Duncan Macgregor and I have a large desktop application that makes very
heavy use of indy.
As Duncan reported recently, we're also seeing increased memory usage and
(probably) decreased performance under u40.
Will contact you privately with details of how we can get you access.
-- G
On Sep 18, 2013, at 1:39 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> I've been playing with JMC a bit tonight, running a user's application
> that's about 2x slower using indy than using trivial monomorphic
> caches (and no indy call sites). I'm trying to understand how to
> interpret what I see.
>
> In
A bit more on performance numbers for this application.
With no indy, monomorphic caches...the full application (a data load)
runs in about a minute. I fully recognize that this is a short run,
but JMC seems to indicate the bulk of code has compiled well before
the halfway point.
With 7u40 or 8,
I've been playing with JMC a bit tonight, running a user's application
that's about 2x slower using indy than using trivial monomorphic
caches (and no indy call sites). I'm trying to understand how to
interpret what I see.
In the Code/Overview results, where it lists "hot packages", the #1
and #2