s; Da Vinci Machine Project
> Subject: Re: JIT and invalidation
>
> On 02/17/2014 08:53 AM, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> > Hi Rémi,
> >
> > I believe this is not actually safe. There is no guarantee that when
> SwitchPoint.invalidateAll() returns that all calls to
>> From: mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net [mailto:mlvm-dev-
>> boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Remi Forax
>> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 22:54
>> To: Da Vinci Machine Project
>> Subject: JIT and invalidation
>>
>> Hi John, Hi Christian, Hi all,
>&
vm-dev-
> boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Remi Forax
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2014 22:54
> To: Da Vinci Machine Project
> Subject: JIT and invalidation
>
> Hi John, Hi Christian, Hi all,
> I don't know if you can test this little code, but when I run it on m
This is very cool. I have a use for this almost immediately (assuming the
performance problems can be fixed).
Thanks,
-dain
On Feb 16, 2014, at 1:54 PM, Remi Forax wrote:
> Hi John, Hi Christian, Hi all,
> I don't know if you can test this little code, but when I run it on my
> laptop (linu
Hi John, Hi Christian, Hi all,
I don't know if you can test this little code, but when I run it on my
laptop (linux 64bits)
it can terminate in 45s or 2 minutes, it seems that it depends on the
order the JIT compiles the method handles.
https://gist.github.com/forax/9041030
Sometimes it also
