On Dec 17, 2008, at 2:16 PM, Iulian Dragos wrote:
> This is where we're heading. But the current implementation is using
> the JSR292 convention, so for my tests I should still use it?
For now, yes. I won't turn it off right away.
> I noticed a very useful method mentioned in the JSR is missing
John Rose a écrit :
> On Dec 18, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>
>
>> Iulian Dragos a écrit :
>> ...
>>
>>> One last question: does mlvm currently recognize the
>>> BootstrapInvokeDynamic classfile attribute?
>>>
>> It's another part of the spec that is outdated.
>> I don't kno
On Dec 18, 2008, at 1:06 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Iulian Dragos a écrit :
> ...
>> One last question: does mlvm currently recognize the
>> BootstrapInvokeDynamic classfile attribute?
> It's another part of the spec that is outdated.
> I don't know exactly why.
> Perhaps john or charles can explain
Iulian Dragos a écrit :
...
> One last question: does mlvm currently recognize the
> BootstrapInvokeDynamic classfile attribute?
It's another part of the spec that is outdated.
I don't know exactly why.
Perhaps john or charles can explain why ?
> My tests were
> unsuccessful, so I'm wondering if m
John Rose a écrit :
> (Wow, guess I must be furious!)
>
> On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:09 PM, John Rose wrote:
>
>> That's right, Remi. I'm working furiously on both spec. and implem.
>>
>> furiously, aiming to get a refresh of both by Christmas.
>>
Cool, can i call you Santa :)
Rémi
_
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:09 PM, John Rose wrote:
> The most recent version of JVM specs. (headed for HotSpot integration
> RSN) is here for engineering review:
> http://webrev.invokedynamic.info/jrose/6655638.meth/
>
> That review copy is changing also; it's now a month old.
John, thanks for
(Wow, guess I must be furious!)
On Dec 17, 2008, at 1:09 PM, John Rose wrote:
That's right, Remi. I'm working furiously on both spec. and implem.
furiously, aiming to get a refresh of both by Christmas.
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
On Dec 17, 2008, at 12:13 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Iulian Dragos a écrit :
>> I noticed several differences between what JSR 292
>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=292) says and the current
>> implementation. I know this is work in progress, but at least one
>> difference seems small enough to be
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 9:13 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Iulian Dragos a écrit :
>> I noticed several differences between what JSR 292
>> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=292) says and the current
>> implementation. I know this is work in progress, but at least one
>> difference seems small enough to
Iulian Dragos a écrit :
> I noticed several differences between what JSR 292
> (http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=292) says and the current
> implementation. I know this is work in progress, but at least one
> difference seems small enough to be an oversight.
>
Currently, the first draft of the sp
I noticed several differences between what JSR 292
(http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=292) says and the current
implementation. I know this is work in progress, but at least one
difference seems small enough to be an oversight.
The signature of the bootstrap method is defined as Object(CallSite
cs,
11 matches
Mail list logo
