On Nov 30, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> On 2011-11-30 11:20, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
>>> Hm, maybe... the fix was really just a tiny tiny bugfix, so that
>>> shouldn't have caused any performance regressions, although, of
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Mark Roos wrote:
> Hi Charles
>
> Interesting results. Is your code for the coro implementation available
> somewhere
> to look at?
On master and jruby-1_6 branch, under
src/org/jruby/ext/fiber/CoroutineFiber.java. It's Lukas's code,
mostly.
https://github.com/
Hi Charles
Interesting results. Is your code for the coro implementation available
somewhere
to look at?
thanks
mark___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
On 2011-11-30 11:20, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
>> Hm, maybe... the fix was really just a tiny tiny bugfix, so that
>> shouldn't have caused any performance regressions, although, of course,
>> I can't say for sure.
>> But maybe something i
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:17 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Hm, maybe... the fix was really just a tiny tiny bugfix, so that
> shouldn't have caused any performance regressions, although, of course,
> I can't say for sure.
> But maybe something in invokedynamic has changed so that it's impacted
> by c
On 2011-11-30 08:49, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> Seconds after I email...A DISCOVERY...
>
> It seems like invokedynamic is causing headaches for coro. Here's the
> numbers with coro fibers and JRuby's invokedynamic support turned
> *off*:
>
> 100 fibers / 1000 passes: 0.076000 0.00 0.0
Seconds after I email...A DISCOVERY...
It seems like invokedynamic is causing headaches for coro. Here's the
numbers with coro fibers and JRuby's invokedynamic support turned
*off*:
100 fibers / 1000 passes: 0.076000 0.00 0.076000 ( 0.077000)
100 fibers / 1000 passes: 0.076000 0.00
Ok, good news and not as good news!
The good news is that coro seems to be working in the latest
openjdk-osx-build, and it definitely improves JRuby's coroutine
performance!
For running bench_fiber_ring with 100 fibers passing 1000 messages,
here's numbers for the threaded impl:
100 fibers / 100
> Awesome, thanks Lukas!
>
> Hopefully when the next openjdk-osx-build runs, it will pick up these
> changes, and we'll have a working coro impl on OS X too :)
Oops, forgot to tweet about it yesterday.
http://openjdk-osx-build.googlecode.com/files/OpenJDK-1.8-x86_64-b11-2029-release.dmg
Chee
Awesome, thanks Lukas!
Hopefully when the next openjdk-osx-build runs, it will pick up these
changes, and we'll have a working coro impl on OS X too :)
- Charlie
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 6:58 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Uh, sorry for the long wait...
> That was another problem that occurs with in
Uh, sorry for the long wait...
That was another problem that occurs with invokedynamic, in particular
with ricochet frames.
I fixed it, pushed the changes and uploaded a new binary to
http://ssw.jku.at/General/Staff/LS/coro/.
- Lukas
On 2011-11-07 00:18, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Ok, bug
Note about the build env for this package.
Done under OSX 10.6.8, XCode 4, gcc/g++ 4.2 (not llvm 4.2).
2011/11/7 Charles Oliver Nutter :
> Ok, bug report time! :)
>
> It looks like it's crashing again once Hotspot JITs.
>
> This works:
>
> jruby --1.9 -Xfiber.coroutines=true bench/bench_fiber_rin
Ok, bug report time! :)
It looks like it's crashing again once Hotspot JITs.
This works:
jruby --1.9 -Xfiber.coroutines=true bench/bench_fiber_ring.rb 10 100 100
But this doesn't:
jruby --1.9 -Xfiber.coroutines=true bench/bench_fiber_ring.rb 10 1000 100
Here's the console output, and I've att
Ok, I get them and coro is included in OpenJDK 8 from openjdk-osx-build
2011/11/6 Henri Gomez :
>
>
> Le 6 nov. 2011 à 22:12, Henri Gomez a écrit :
>
>> Hi to all,
>>
>> I'm looking for Coro patch by Lukas Stadler, any body knows where I can find
>> it ?
>
> More on this, I found patch here
> (
Yes, I do :-)
The patch is part of the mlvm patch repository:
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm
(see instructions at http://wikis.sun.com/display/mlvm/Home)
... but if you don't want to build the jdk yourself there's a pre-built binary
at:
http://ssw.jku.at/General/Staff/LS/coro/
- Lukas
On
Hi Lukas,
Thanks for the info. I've also noticed that after looking deeper into the
source code. the 32 bit build works great! Looking forward to your 64 bit
patch.
Best,
--Tuolin
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:07 AM, Lukas Stadler wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Ok, I see... 64-bit support is something that I'm
Hi!
Ok, I see... 64-bit support is something that I'm working on right now,
I probably should've put in an assertion to make that clear. Sorry!
It'll be finished in a week or so. (why are there different java calling
conventions in linux and windows? argh...)
I hope you're ok with using the 3
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 6:07 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On May 11, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Tuolin Chen wrote:
>
> > I'm new to mlvm and I'm trying to get Lukas' coro.patch to work.
> >
> > I grabbed the source and patches according to openjdk and mlvm build
> instructions. Everything is done on my laptop r
On May 11, 2010, at 7:45 AM, Tuolin Chen wrote:
> I'm new to mlvm and I'm trying to get Lukas' coro.patch to work.
>
> I grabbed the source and patches according to openjdk and mlvm build
> instructions. Everything is done on my laptop running Ubuntu 10.04 64bit
> version. Only coro patch is ap
19 matches
Mail list logo
