On Aug 19, 2009, at 3:54 AM, Raffaello Giulietti wrote:
> Fortunately, the JVM doesn't know about checked exceptions. Let's hope
> this will remain so even in the future.
The Java language checks exceptions statically. The JVM doesn't.
Neither of these facts will change in the foreseeable fut
Patrick Wright wrote:
> The issue of InvokeDynamic calls from Java as regards checked
> exceptions was discussed on the Project Coin mailing list:
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/coin-dev/2009-May/thread.html#1650
>
> see the mails related to "JSR 292" and others with "292" in the title.
The issue of InvokeDynamic calls from Java as regards checked
exceptions was discussed on the Project Coin mailing list:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/coin-dev/2009-May/thread.html#1650
see the mails related to "JSR 292" and others with "292" in the title.
See for example this partial thr
Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Raffaello
> Giulietti wrote:
>> The language compiler complains about an
>> unreported exception Throwable; must be caught or declared to be thrown
>> in using both InvokeDynamic and the (invisible) MethodHandle.invoke()
>>
>> Why is t
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:29 AM, Raffaello
Giulietti wrote:
> The language compiler complains about an
> unreported exception Throwable; must be caught or declared to be thrown
> in using both InvokeDynamic and the (invisible) MethodHandle.invoke()
>
> Why is this so?
> What about an (unchecked) Ru
