On Jun 14, 2011, at 5:21 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification, John. I'll go with asFixedArity().
Great! BTW, this little method got into the API "by the skin of its teeth".
Here's an interesting related exercise: If I have a variable-arity method
handle (like #Arrays.asL
Thanks for the clarification, John. I'll go with asFixedArity().
Super excited as for the first time in history, Dynalink will get down to 0
failing testcases as OpenJDK bugs making them fail got squashed, yay!
Attila.
On Jun 13, 2011, at 12:51 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Jun 11, 2011, at 2:18
On Jun 11, 2011, at 2:18 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> And BTW, attempts at using invoke() or invokeExact() didn't work either… They
> all behave strangely. What's the sanctioned way to pass an array explicitly
> as a vararg argument?
See the updated example below. The javadoc for invokeWithArgu
It also works with Stephan's 2011_05_02 MLVM build; it's only 2011_06_09 that
breaks this behavior.
Attila.
On Jun 11, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> It works with jdk7 b144,
> no way to access to b145 due to java.net maintenance.
>
> Rémi
>
> On 06/11/2011 11:18 PM, Attila Szegedi wro
It works with jdk7 b144,
no way to access to b145 due to java.net maintenance.
Rémi
On 06/11/2011 11:18 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
public class TestVarArgInvoke {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable {
java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.publicLookup().unreflect(
TestVa
And BTW, attempts at using invoke() or invokeExact() didn't work either… They
all behave strangely. What's the sanctioned way to pass an array explicitly as
a vararg argument?
On Jun 10, 2011, at 2:34 PM, Attila Szegedi wrote:
> I found a regression between Mac OS X MLVM build from April 4 and
I found a regression between Mac OS X MLVM build from April 4 and June 6 (based
on bsd-port jdk7-b145). Here's a minimal reproducing testcase:
public class TestVarArgInvoke {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable {
java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.publicLookup().unreflect(
