Hello,
I'm out of the office Dec 24 2010 through Jan 9 2011.
Please refer to David Cox (david.cox) and Daniel Källander (daniel.kallander).
Regards,
Henrik Österdahl
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
* Rémi Forax [2011-01-06 13:30] writes:
that is essentially a constant butexp must be evaluated at load time
and not later (as would be done with lazy linking).
why not using a static final field initialized in clinit in that case ?
Because final static fields can't be optimized as well as
On 01/06/2011 04:08 PM, Helmut Eller wrote:
* Rémi Forax [2011-01-06 13:30] writes:
that is essentially a constant butexp must be evaluated at load time
and not later (as would be done with lazy linking).
why not using a static final field initialized inclinit in that case ?
Because final
On Jan 6, 2011, at 1:12 AM, Helmut Eller wrote:
* John Rose [2011-01-06 02:37] writes:
Live constants are definitely one of the use cases that
invokedynamic is designed for.
Are/will there be any means to link invokedynamic call sites eagerly
instead of the lazy linking scheme?
E.g.
In fact for hotspot, this kind of constant can be even more optimized
than a static final field containing a non-primitive values which is
not a real constant
(it can be modified by reflection).
I don't think final fields can be modified via reflection. An
IllegalAccessException with the
Thanks Remi, the extra comments really helped
You also mentioned
There is another way to do something similar,
you can call invokedynamic, use the bootstrap arguments to send
the primitive values composing the object value and when the
BSM is called returns a ConstantCallSite with as
On 12/26/2010 08:33 PM, Mark Roos wrote:
We are working on a port of Smalltalk to the MLVM. For this we were
thinking of using the
constant patch feature of the anonymous class loader in java.dyn.anon
to create constant pool
entries with instances of our Smalltalk types.
Is this feature
Hello,
I'm out of the office Dec 24 2010 through Jan 9 2011.
Please refer to David Cox (david.cox) and Daniel Källander (daniel.kallander).
Regards,
Henrik Österdahl
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
I am curious what you mean here...storing atypical object values (not
string, int, etc) in the constant pool? Is that possible?
On Sunday, December 26, 2010, Mark Roos mr...@roos.com wrote:
We are working on a port of Smalltalk to
the MLVM. For this we were thinking of using the
constant
Hello,
I'm out of the office Dec 24 2010 through Jan 9 2011.
Please refer to David Cox (david.cox) and Daniel Källander (daniel.kallander).
Regards,
Henrik Österdahl
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
Hello,
I'm out of the office Dec 24 2010 through Jan 9 2011.
Please refer to David Cox (david.cox) and Daniel Källander (daniel.kallander).
Regards,
Henrik Österdahl
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
This is an automatic response. I am on vacation from 12/20 through 12/26, and
not generally reading or responding to emai during that period. For urgent
matters please contact my manager David Cox or Jon Masamitsu.
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
