Rémi Forax wrote:
Le 12/08/2010 08:20, John Rose a écrit :
I just posted a prototype patch for local BSMs which works on my unit
tests.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/file/tip/asm
There is also an updated ldc patch.
I've put the patches with some good examples here:
, you relink the affected indy
instructions. This clearly uses a different BSM than any pre-existing BSM used
by the original compiler.
-- John
regards,
Eugene
Rémi Forax wrote:
Le 13/07/2010 04:59, John Rose a écrit :
Folks, the 292 EG has decided to register bootstrap methods
Le 12/08/2010 08:20, John Rose a écrit :
I just posted a prototype patch for local BSMs which works on my unit tests.
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/file/tip/asm
There is also an updated ldc patch.
I've put the patches with some good examples here:
On Jul 13, 2010, at 5:39 AM, Eugene Kuleshov wrote:
what would be the meaning of bootstrap method pointing to a
method handle of get/putField or get/putStatic type?
It's syntactically valid as a classfile, but the instruction will fail to link
with InvokeDynamicBootstrapError, with cause
Folks, the 292 EG has decided to register bootstrap methods in the constant
pool, instead of via a call from the clinit method.
Here's a summary of constant pool formats as of the latest push to mlvm.
This will require further changes to asm, Mirah, and other bytecode-aware tools.
For now
