Re: rebasing to current bsd-port

2009-07-27 Thread Christian Thalinger
John Rose wrote: > In order to get ready to push a load of changes into JDK7, I have > rebased the mlvm patches (hotspot, jdk, langtools) to the current > (5/19) contents of bsd-port. > > This includes a workaround for jdk called fake_fdopendir.patch. This > workaround is intended only for

Re: rebasing to current bsd-port

2009-07-27 Thread John Rose
Right. The EG objected to the name. -- John On Jul 23, 2009, at 2:29 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: > I haven't coded them because they are tagged as should be removed in a > post-M3 build. > ___ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.ope

Re: rebasing to current bsd-port

2009-07-23 Thread Rémi Forax
Le 22/07/2009 08:13, John Rose a écrit : [...] > In other news, the JSR 292 EG has been busy with the APIs and is > making adjustments. Expect some instability, such as the recent > change (for the better!) from MethodHandles.invoke_1 to > MethodHandles.invoke. > backport updated :) By the

rebasing to current bsd-port

2009-07-21 Thread John Rose
In order to get ready to push a load of changes into JDK7, I have rebased the mlvm patches (hotspot, jdk, langtools) to the current (5/19) contents of bsd-port. This includes a workaround for jdk called fake_fdopendir.patch. This workaround is intended only for Mac, and is untested on other