John Rose skrev:
> It would let you emulate the super(...) call in a language which needs
> to make a subclass of some Java class with a non-trivial constructor,
> without forcing the language to generate bytecodes for that subclass's
> constructor call.
When I think a little bit more about t
On May 6, 2009, at 4:03 AM, Fredrik Öhrström wrote:
> The bytecode verifier also prohibits calling a constructor on an
> already
> initialized reference. With a MethodHandle to a constructor it would
> be
> possible violate this restriction. I am not sure this is a good idea.
You're right in
Changeset: 556edafa03fd
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-05-06 18:57 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/langtools/rev/556edafa03fd
meth, quid: update patch repo consistently with yesterday's push to JDK7 of
6829189
! meth-6829189.patch < meth.patch
! meth.txt
! quid-6829189.pa
Changeset: a5f19be63c32
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-05-06 19:45 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/a5f19be63c32
meth, indy: update patch repo consistently with yesterday's push to JDK7 of
6829144
+ anonk-6829144.patch
- anonk.patch
! indy-6829144.patch < indy.patc
Changeset: 62704edcb9f0
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-05-06 20:03 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/62704edcb9f0
dyncast: add experimental patch
+ dyncast.patch
Changeset: a63c9ae3622a
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-05-06 20:03 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.
Changeset: 2e0a61f2128a
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-05-06 19:59 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/langtools/rev/2e0a61f2128a
meth: restart patch empty after 6829189
+ meth.patch
! series
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openj
