While hacking the backport, I found some hitches in MethodHandles doc,
here is my notes:
- The documentation of spread/collectArgument talk about an array type T[]
but T is not defined. The question here is: Can T be a primitive type
or not ?
- Mismatch between spread/collectArguments() regar
The example provided in the doc of MethodHandles.dropArgument
seems to contains some mistakes:
MethodHandle cat = MethodHandles.lookup().
findVirtual(String.class, "concat", String.class, String.class);
System.out.println(cat.invoke("x", "y")); // xy
MethodHandle d0 = dropArguments(cat, 0, St
From just after 12:00 today until 2:00 I'll be working quietly in the
Nob Hill room on the 4th floor of the Intercontinental. This room has
been reserved by the JCP for EG use; let's use it to talk JSR 292.
-- John
P.S. Previously sent info:
June 3, 2009 from 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM
June 4, 20
Yeah, sorry I missed the other times. I will come over in a bit after I
dig out from some email.
John Rose wrote:
> From just after 12:00 today until 2:00 I'll be working quietly in the
> Nob Hill room on the 4th floor of the Intercontinental. This room has
> been reserved by the JCP for EG
Changeset: 1f748158f7ed
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-06-04 20:51 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/rev/1f748158f7ed
updated demo code
! netbeans/indy-demo/build.xml
! netbeans/indy-demo/nbproject/project.properties
! netbeans/indy-demo/src/Main.java
+ netbeans/indy-demo/sr
Changeset: f530923ed10a
Author:jrose
Date: 2009-06-04 21:28 -0700
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/f530923ed10a
works with updated demo code
! indy.patch
___
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.op
