On Feb 16, 2011, at 6:21 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>> Ahh, I must still have one or more of my permutes botched. I'll try to
>> fix this up today. Thanks!
>
> When this is in, I try to confirm your numbers.
I can confirm your numbers. This is a 32-bit Linux product build:
$ $JAVA_HOME/bin/
On 02/18/2011 11:44 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2011, at 6:21 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>> Ahh, I must still have one or more of my permutes botched. I'll try to
>>> fix this up today. Thanks!
>> When this is in, I try to confirm your numbers.
> I can confirm your numbers.
Go
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> Good news !
> Charles does it mean that JRuby's invokedynamic now works without
> using the previously existing logic.
> I mean, you use only method handles from the callsite to the target method.
More and more, but definitely not completely. I
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:52 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> I did just land another revision that allows Ruby to Ruby calls
> meeting the above criteria to bind all the way through, and
> performance dropped precipitously:
The degradation for tak is just as significant:
Before:
~/projects/j
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> wrote:
>> I did just land another revision that allows Ruby to Ruby calls
>> meeting the above criteria to bind all the way through, and
>> performance dropped precipitously:
>
> The degradation for tak is just as significant:
More
On Feb 18, 2011, at 12:52 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:24 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
>> Good news !
>> Charles does it mean that JRuby's invokedynamic now works without
>> using the previously existing logic.
>> I mean, you use only method handles from the callsite to th
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> Is there a switch to turn direct ruby-to-ruby calls on and off? I'd like to
> compare inlining trees and maybe code output.
Just pushed a couple for you in a4a0802:
jruby.compile.invokedynamic.rubyDirect=true|false (Ruby targets
dir
FYI, my "patches/hotspot" dir is at revision 6eddc7cbeba6
- Charlie
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Christian Thalinger
> wrote:
>> Is there a switch to turn direct ruby-to-ruby calls on and off? I'd like to
>> compare inlining
On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> FYI, my "patches/hotspot" dir is at revision 6eddc7cbeba6
I'm using hotspot-comp/hotspot/ -- Christian
>
> - Charlie
>
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Christian Th
On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Christian Thalinger
> wrote:
>> Is there a switch to turn direct ruby-to-ruby calls on and off? I'd like to
>> compare inlining trees and maybe code output.
>
> Just pushed a couple for you in a4a0802:
On Feb 18, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> On Feb 18, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:17 AM, Christian Thalinger
>> wrote:
>>> Is there a switch to turn direct ruby-to-ruby calls on and off? I'd like
>>> to compare inlining trees and may
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Christian Thalinger
wrote:
> What I can tell so far is that setting rubyDirect=true inlines a whole lot
> more stuff than without. I looks like it wants to inline all recursive calls
> of fib_ruby into a single method, which doesn't work very well, hitting two
I also need to say this: PUT ME TO WORK :)
I'm very eager to start showing off invokedynamic and make it
pervasive throughout JRuby (or as pervasive as possible while still
supporting Java 6). Tell me what I need to do to help!
- Charlie
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
wr
13 matches
Mail list logo
