Variance in Dart somehow bears a problem similar to the one in Java's array:
http://try-dart-lang.appspot.com/s/qAoU
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 09:51 AM, Marcus Lagergren wrote:
> > FYI,
> >
> > Google Dart now has a twitter account :
> > https://twitter.c
On 10/11/2011 09:08 AM, Krystal Mok wrote:
Variance in Dart somehow bears a problem similar to the one in Java's
array:
http://try-dart-lang.appspot.com/s/qAoU
The dartboard don't do any type checking at all.
But yes, reading the doc it seems that generics are covariant and
contravariant.
R
On 10/11/2011 12:22 AM, John Rose wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Douglas Campos wrote:
>
>> Hello mlvm friends, just a heads up that dyn.js is released at
>> https://github.com/dynjs/dyn.js
>>
>> feedback is more than welcome :)
> Congratulations on getting this working...
>
> Nice, crunchy
On 10/10/2011 8:42 PM, BGB wrote:
On 10/10/2011 6:56 PM, John Rose wrote:
On Oct 10, 2011, at 6:48 PM, Krystal Mok wrote:
It's cute when you can find DartEntry::InvokeDynamic(...) in Dart
VM's code [1] :-)
(Just for fun; doesn't imply any connection with JVM's invokedynamic)
It's not deriva
On 10/10/2011 08:58 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
> I agree it would be an interesting language on the JVM. It may be the
> "dynamic Java" I've wanted to make for a long time, with the added
> bonus of optional static types.
>
> This could almost be a weekend project atop invokedynamic.
The typ
> If John plays the good guy, I will play the bad one :)
I really appreciate both - There's tons of things to learn :)
>
> You should get rid of all the scope stuff for local variables.
> One var in Javascript should be one local variable on the Java stack.
> (if you only implement the strict mod
Adding some thoughts of my own…
On Oct 11, 2011, at 1:00 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> And at the end, all predefined Javascript objects should be re-written
> in Javascript,
> with some native calls to Java but it will be easier for providing the
> core API.
> By example, for javascript Number, it s
On 10/11/2011 2:03 AM, Rémi Forax wrote:
> On 10/10/2011 08:58 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>> I agree it would be an interesting language on the JVM. It may be the
>> "dynamic Java" I've wanted to make for a long time, with the added
>> bonus of optional static types.
>>
>> This could almost b
Hi all,
FYI - I checked with Georges Saab and he thinks there was simply an
outage at Santa Clara. Let me know if the page is still down!
There is a longer term plan to shift things off the older
infrastructure, details TBA.
Cheers,
Martijn
On 9 October 2011 21:59, Krystal Mok wrote:
> On Mon
Unfortunately, this thread has been a little off-topic for a while
now. I don't think there is a good single forum for "let's complain
about Dart design decisions", and it probably isn't useful to do so,
as every person I've spoken to on the subject has something completely
different that they dis
10 matches
Mail list logo
