On Mar 29, 2012, at 7:25 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 7:31 PM, John Rose wrote:
>
>> On Mar 21, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
>>
>>> John, I think there is a bug in MacroAssembler::check_method_handle_type
>>> for x86 (with meth-lazy):
>>
>> That's co
Hi,
I've last updated the coro patch beginning of December, and people have
been compiling and using it at least mid-February.
It is quite experimental, but it's complete enough to prove the
usefulness of coroutines on a JVM.
One important step towards coroutines on Java is a JSR, I guess...
Getting coro into JDK8 is obviously not possible now, but the sooner
we get started the more likely we can shoot for JDK9. That needs
people with cycles. I have some, and I'm willing to help, but I do not
know how the JSR process works (yes, I should learn) and I'm not
enough of a VM-level expert t
Hi Lukas/Charlie,
Basically we're trying to get more people involved in the OpenJDK as well
as
helping projects like coroutines get into a good shape for possible
inclusion into
the OpenJDK. This includes helping out with JEP and JSR processes as a
project matures.
In this case I think the suitab
> In this case I think the suitable thing to do would be to coordinate work
> around
> your existing patch via some sort of OSS project and look at all of the
> aspects
> that would need to be covered in order for it to be accepted into the
> OpenJDK.
> For example, a lot of thought will need to go
Hi Lukas
A question I have on your coro implementation is just how sensitive it
is to changes in HotSpot. I am planning to give it a go and am wondering
if I need to be a Hotspot expert as well ( in case it breaks ).
On the same topic I recall that you build a small object code piece to
give
ac
Hi Martizn
If the effort meets my needs I'll be there to help. My goal is a full
implementation
of Smalltalk on the JVM. One thing I need is the ability to manipulate a
suspended
thread from the object side. For this Lukas' work seems a good fit.
My concern is that (as John Rose points out )
Hi Mark,
On 3 April 2012 00:40, Mark Roos wrote:
> Hi Martijn
>
> If the effort meets my needs I'll be there to help. My goal is a full
> implementation
> of Smalltalk on the JVM. One thing I need is the ability to manipulate a
> suspended
> thread from the object side. For this Lukas' work s
