Re: OSX port

2012-04-21 Thread Martijn Verburg
This would be extremely helpful in being able to organise hack nights with the Java User Groups globally to beat up on an experimental feature and provide feedback on it here (such as coroutines). Cheers, Martijn On 20 April 2012 00:27, Henri Gomez wrote: > Hi to all, > > I'm wondering when OSX

Re: [jvm-l] Clever uses of InvokeDynamic

2012-04-21 Thread Julien Ponge
Maybe I'm a bit late into the game, but we demoed with Frederic Le Mouel at Devoxx France an early prototype of a dynamic AOP JVM agent called JooFlux that takes advantage of invokedynamic. It's still a research project at this stage, but we will eventually publish this and release the code as an o

Boxed types and constat propagation

2012-04-21 Thread Kohsuke Kawaguchi
Hi, I was inspired by the talk by Charles in JAX 2012 and was playing with invokedynamic a bit. I'm observing what seems like a constant propagation failure, which I'd imagine would affect some important use cases, so I wanted to check if I'm not doing something stupid. I've used Apache JEXL [1]

Re: Boxed types and constat propagation

2012-04-21 Thread Mark Roos
>From Kohsuke Kawaguchi email - How do other language implementers cope with this? We are doing a Smalltalk implementation and have seen that the handling of 'boxed' integers is a possible performance issue. I say possible because while it is an obvious issue for integer intensive operations (

Re: Boxed types and constat propagation

2012-04-21 Thread Rémi Forax
See inlined comments :) On 04/22/2012 12:02 AM, Kohsuke Kawaguchi wrote: > Hi, > > I was inspired by the talk by Charles in JAX 2012 and was playing with > invokedynamic a bit. I'm observing what seems like a constant > propagation failure, which I'd imagine would affect some important use > cases