using MethodHandle in place of virtual methods?

2012-05-16 Thread Per Bothner
I'm pondering how Kawa can make use of MethodHandles without (yet) going the full invokedynamic route. Specifically, I'm considering using MethodHandles in place of virtual methods, and I'm hoping someone has some information on the likely costs and benefits. The attachment ProcUsingVirt.java sk

hg: mlvm/mlvm/jdk: meth-lazy: removed debug statements

2012-05-16 Thread christian . thalinger
Changeset: 989b69af27d3 Author:twisti Date: 2012-05-16 11:56 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/989b69af27d3 meth-lazy: removed debug statements ! meth-lazy-7023639.patch ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.ja

Re: using MethodHandle in place of virtual methods?

2012-05-16 Thread Charles Oliver Nutter
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Per Bothner wrote: > The attachment ProcUsingVirt.java sketches out the current implementation. > This uses virtual apply[01N] methods that are overridden by specific > Procedure subclasses.  (Kawa actually has apply[01234N], but I've > simplified.) Very similar

hg: mlvm/mlvm/hotspot: annot: adjust comments

2012-05-16 Thread john . r . rose
Changeset: ee6b2d85bfdd Author:jrose Date: 2012-05-16 22:57 -0700 URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/hotspot/rev/ee6b2d85bfdd annot: adjust comments ! annot.patch ! annot.txt ___ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net htt